Worst movie dialogue ever

I recently watched the movie Four Weddings and a Funeral. I saw it years ago, but this film is timeless. Sadly, the excellence of the movie is tarnished by one of the cheesiest lines in all of cinematic history. At the close of the movie, Charles and Carrie are standing in the rain, together at last. The final few lines of the movie include this gem:

Charles: There I was, standing there in the church, and for the first time in my whole life I realized I totally and utterly loved one person. And it wasn't the person next to me in the veil. It's the person standing opposite me now... in the rain.

Carrie: Is it still raining? I hadn't noticed.

How this bit of dialogue didn’t end up on the cutting room floor is beyond me. Compounding the problem is Andie MacDowell’s poor delivery of the line, but it’s so awful that I can hardly blame her. She was probably throwing up in her mouth as she uttered the words.

My least favorite bit of dialogue comes from Back to the Future. In this scene, Marty McFly, having traveled thirty years into the past, is sitting at the counter of a 1950’s soda shop when the owner, Lou, begins speaking.

Lou: You gonna order something, kid? Marty McFly: Ah, yeah... Give me - Give me a Tab. Lou: Tab? I can't give you a tab unless you order something. Marty McFly: All right, give me a Pepsi Free. Lou: You want a Pepsi, pal, you're gonna pay for it.

A Tab? I realize that this diet cola still exists, but did anyone under the age of sixty ever drink the stuff? And what’s more, even my grandmother wouldn’t order a Tab in a restaurant. Marty is a seventeen year old kid from 1985. He deserves the beating that Biff soon delivers for ordering this stuff.

Then he asks for a Pepsi Free. Again, who orders a Pepsi Free?

Pepsi? Sure. Diet Pepsi? Okay.

But a Pepsi Free?

Worse bit of forced dialogue ever.

Can you have too much choice?

A new Aldi’s grocery store has opened about a mile from my home. The foundation is being poured this week. I must ask:  Do we need a new grocery store? Within fifteen minutes of my home, the following grocery stores are available to me:

Stop & Shop Super Stop & Shop Whole Foods Price Chopper Roger’s Shaw's Waldbaum's Trader Joe's Stew Leonard’s BJ’s Wholesale Sam’s Club

And this doesn’t count the small, local grocers and butchers like Hall’s Market.

Do we really need another grocery store?

Consumer choice is a good thing, but the problem with all these stores is that people aren’t making any choices. I can’t tell you how many people I know who buy their meat at one store, their produce at a second store, their dry goods and dairy at a third location, and so on. This sounds fine and dandy on the surface, but all this choice is sending people all over town, clogging our roads, burning gasoline, producing CO2, and (worst of all) wasting inordinate amounts of time on the purchase of food.

Not to mention how inadequate and stupid some of these stores are.

Like Whole Foods. They’ll sell me a slice of pepperoni pizza but can’t deign to sell me a Coke to wash it down.

Or Stew Leonard’s, the amusement park version of a grocery store, equipped with just one aisle that zigzags through the store, complete with animatronic entertainment and carnival-like hawkers at every turn.

When I grew up, there was one grocery store in town. Almacs. If my parents chose to drive into the neighboring town, there were two more grocery stores available to us. That was it.

From my home today, I am a fifteen minute drive from twelve full-size grocery stores, one butcher and at least two smaller, local grocers.

I ask again: Do we really need to add an Aldi’s to the mix?

House tours

I promise to never, ever force a house tour upon any of you.

If you would like to see my house, I’d be more than happy to show you around. But the need for people to show me their bedrooms, their second floor bathrooms, and their finished basements baffles me.

If you designed and built your own home, or if you recently underwent a major remodel, I’m willing to make an exception.  But if you bought a house that just happens to have three bedrooms and a bathroom upstairs, I have no need to see them.

Can I get a secular amen?

Is there a reason to cater to adults?

My daughter has started watching Sesame Street in the morning while my wife is taking a shower and getting ready for work.  As a result, we’ve been catching a few minutes here and there, and I’ve been shocked at the number of parodies and spoofs that the makers of Sesame Street use as a framework for their segments. 

Law and Order, Mad Men and Sex in the City are just three that I have seen, and she’s only been watching the show for a few weeks. 

I don’t get it. 

Do the producers think that parents are watching this show?

Do they think that we find these parodies entertaining?

Why cater this show to adults at all?  If the goal is to teach the kids about the alphabet, isn’t there a better and more engaging way of doing so than placing the lesson in the framework of a Law and Order episode, complete with dozens of Law and Order’s famous transitional bong-bongs?

Having never seen an episode of Law and Order, what is my daughter thinking as the bong-bong fires off again and again? 

I’m sure it’s not helping her learn about the letter B. 

Ladies. Please. My daughter’s future is at stake.

“A 2007 study by the Workplace Bullying Institute found that 37 percent of the US workforce reported being bullied at work. Among those who mistreat their co-workers, women were more likely to target other women (71 percent), compared men who bully other men (44 percent.)” “It’s a dirty little secret among women that we don’t support one another,” said Susan Shapiro Barash, who teaches gender studies at Marymount Manhattan College and is author of Tripping the Prom Queen: The Truth About Women and Rivalry and Toxic Friend: The Antidote for Women Stuck in COmplicated Relationships. 

A perfect example of this unfortunate phenomenon is former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina, the Republican Senate candidate in California, attacking Democratic incumbent, Senator Barbara Boxer’s hair in a recent TV interview.

“God, what is that hair?  So yesterday,” she said, thinking her microphone was off.

As a man who has attended an all-women’s college for three years and has spent most of his life working in industries dominated by women, I have seen this lack of support amongst women firsthand.  In middle school, it’s called the “mean girl syndrome.”

And yes, I have known many, many women who are greatly supportive of one another. And yes, not every woman would deign to insult the hairstyle of a competitor.

But if these statistics are to be believed. it’s much more likely for a woman to attempt to undercut another woman than a man to do the same.

And now that I have a daughter who will enter the workforce in about twenty years, my concern over this disparity has increased exponentially.

Women have enough challenges with glass ceilings and unequal pay to be making it more difficult on one another.

You have two decades to straighten this situation out, ladies, before my daughter is standing amongst your ranks.

Can I be of any assistance?

Roses are red. Not green.

For all the talk about the importance of local foods and the impact that shipping food from around the world has on the environment, isn’t it time to take a long, hard look at the flower industry? In many cases, flowers are shipped to destinations around the world in refrigeration, and for no other purpose than decoration. While I am cutting down my consumption of lemons and limes in beverages because of the energy required bringing them to y glass (and because Diet Coke was just fine without a lemon for years), at least lemons and limes are capable of providing me with the vitamins, nutrients, and the calories necessary to sustain life.

To actively support the shipping of flowers across the country for the sole purpose of decorating the dinner table seems like one of the least-green things a person can do.

A lemon wedge in a glass of soda is frivolous and unnecessary, but to order a dozen roses on Valentine’s Day, in the dead of the New England winter, is downright irresponsible.

No?

Are wives really this rotten?

On Slate’s recent Dear Prudence video podcasts, Emily Yoffe, who plays the role as Prudence, was giving advice to a pregnant woman who was suffering from nausea while at work.  Yoffe said:

Oh yes, I remember in my third month my husband was heating up Chinese food for dinner. I made him eat it on the porch.

I hate this. Hate it. Hate it. Hate it.

Do you know what I’m talking about? Note how Yoffe said that she “made her husband eat on the porch.”

Made him?

Why perpetuate the stereotype of the bitchy, bossy, housewife? It’s my hope that Yoffe simply asked her husband to eat on the porch, rather than “making him.”

But I hear this kind of talk quite often.

I told my husband to do this. I made him do that. I warned him about this. I sent him to do that.

I even hear husbands buying into the stereotype, talking about how they are going to “get in trouble” for this and that.

Get in trouble? Did these guys marry their mothers?

I don’t believe for a minute that all of these wives are truly as domineering, insistent and intractable as they claim to be. Marriage is a partnership, a process of compromise, a progression of give and take, and I like to think it works this way more often than not.

I'd like to think that the stereotype of the impossibly demanding, unrelenting wife is more myth than reality.

But with women like Emily Yoffe bragging about their propensity to order their husbands around, pregnant or otherwise, this is a stereotype that will not die anytime soon.

Go home.

I don’t understand the people who hang out in the gas station convenience stores, lingering by the counter, engaging the employees in mindless, inane chatter between customers.

Please tell me that you know who I’m talking about.

These are the idiots who are nearly (but not quite) blocking your path to the counter every time you approach the cash register with a gallon of milk and a Snickers bar. They are not quite in your way, but they are occupying space that you could have used had they not been there. They’re usually standing just to the left of the lottery machine, a step or two back from the counter, with a coffee or a fountain soda in hand, shuffling their feet as if engaged in the laziest, most unimaginative version of Dance Dance Revolution ever created.

Worst of all, their sole topic of conversation seems to be a listing of what they did yesterday (basically nothing) and what they have planned for tomorrow (even less). Not once have I heard one of these degenerates discussing politics, current events, sports or any other topic that would require at least a 6th grade level of education.

What are these people doing with their lives?

Yesterday I stopped at Cumberland Farms for gas and saw one of these shoe-shufflers standing by the counter, explaining the best way to get to East Hartford from Glastonbury to the disinterested cashier who was trying to collect payment from customers.  After picking up dinner for Elysha and myself, I returned to the Cumberland Farms, realizing that I needed a bottle of soda before heading home. At least 45 minutes had passed since my first visit and the idiot was still there, occupying the same four linoleum tiles that he had been when I saw him last.

Is this really the best these people can do in terms of entertainment?

Aren’t these the kind of people for whom Law and Order reruns and TBS movie marathons were made?  Perhaps these people need to be reminded about the accommodations that these cable television networks have made specifically for them in terms of programming.

And perhaps one day soon I will become aggravated enough to be the one to remind them.

Not funny

I sat behind an old Hungarian woman at dinner tonight, listening to her complain to her friends that all the good jokes are gone because of this “goddamn political correctness.”

“I used to be so funny,” she said. “But now I can’t use my Polish jokes, my Italian jokes, my Jewish jokes. I can’t even make fun of my own people. I’ve got my head stuffed with jokes that I can’t even use anymore. This world is ridiculous!”

It must be tough to get old and watch the world change around you.

I actually felt bad for the old lady.

How old is considered fully cooked?

In the midst of a recent discussion on conformity, religion, clothing and parenting (I know, quite a combination), I was told by someone significantly older than me that my idealism, my lack of conformity and my overall bullish nature will give way to pragmatism, conservatism and conventionality as I get older. I'm in my fourth decade of life.

How old do I have to be before I can officially be declared fully baked?

An idealist for life?

A perpetual non-conformist?

A frequent challenger of tradition and norms?

In truth, I like to think of myself as a logical realist, but regardless of the nomenclature, after almost four decades on this planet, will I really change so much in the next two or three decades that my outlook on life will be entirely different?

Simply put, how old do I need to be before people will stop warning me that I will see things very differently when I get older?

The most distressing part of these conversations is the realization that by the time I reach the age of my older friends and am finally in a position to say, “I told you so,” most of my older friends will likely be dead.

Peeing into your golf club is not a solution to not a problem.

There’s so much to say about this product. So much.

Let’s begin with the fact that someone thought that this was a good idea.

A golf club designed to hold a player’s urine.

The ad copy reads:

How many times has this happened? You’re playing 18 holes with your best buddies, drinking sport-“ades”, water, beer, etc. You’re coming up to the 3rd hole with no rest room in sight. There are no trees or bushes around and you just have to go, what are you going to do?

Actually, this has never happened to me, because I play at golf courses that are littered with trees and bushes. Too many in fact. When was the last time anyone played at a golf course devoid of trees or bushes? Where is this Floridian urologist playing? Death Valley?

The UroClub™ is the discrete, sanitary way for your urgent relief. Created by a Board Certified Urologist, it looks like an ordinary golf club, but contains a reservoir built into the grip to relieve yourself. The UroClub™ is leak proof, easy to clean and no more embarrassing moments.

What embarrassing moments? Are we to believe that golfers all around the world are wetting their pants on the course? And if so, why not just wear an adult diaper. It has to be more discreet than this:

Here’s a few more gems from the website:

This may sound like a joke, but it’s not. I am a Board Certified Urologist, practicing in Florida, a place where Golf is played year round.

Since when do we capitalize the names of sports, Mr. Board Certified Urologist?

A camouflaged portable urinal, designed to be discrete, sanitary and create an air of privacy! It looks like an ordinary golf club and comes equipped with a unique removable golf towel clipped to the shaft that functions as a privacy shield!

Did someone actually write the words “clipped to the shaft” in relation to this product?

Imagine, giving the appearance of taking a practice swing, while both privately and confidentially, you are able to relieve yourself without any embarrassment!

I don’t know about you, but I couldn’t take a practice swing and pee at the same time if I was the only golfer on the course and it was midnight on an overcast night.  These two activities, swinging and urinating, do not coincide in any way, even if the world, and not just a thin, golf club, was my toilet.

I fear that thousand years from now, archaeologists will excavate a UroClub, along with a recording of the Macarena and a pair of sweatpants with the word Juicy splayed across the butt and assume that they have stumbled upon a hitherto unknown species of primates.

Deathbed regrets

I don’t ever plan on dying, but if I did, I would hope to die without too many regrets. A palliative care worker recently wrote about the top five regrets that she heard from dying patients. They are:

1. I wish I'd had the courage to live a life true to myself, not the life others expected of me.

This should not be a problem for me.  In fact, I may end up wishing that I had been willing to conform a little more often over the course of my never-ending  lifetime, but we’ll see.  Either way, this is a theme that runs through all of my books and one that is extremely important to me, so I’m inclined to think that this would be the last thing that I would find myself regretting on my hypothetical deathbed.

2. I wish I didn't work so hard.

This might be a problem for me, though I am more inclined to think that I would regret the number of hours spent working rather than the amount of effort that I put forth. While I enjoy the work that I do a great deal, I work a lot. But will I regret the hours spent teaching and writing? Maybe…

3. I wish I'd had the courage to express my feelings.

This, like the first regret, is not going to be an issue for me. Once again, I may find myself regretting the reverse. I may end up lamenting my lack of tact and restraint at times but certainly not the courage to express my feelings.

4. I wish I had stayed in touch with my friends.

Also not a concern for me. With very little family, my friends have come to play an enormous role in my life, and I stay in close touch with them on a regular basis. A friend recently commented on the large number of friends that Elysha and I have, and I feel blessed to be so fortunate.

And besides, with Facebook, who can’t stay in touch with friends these days?

5. I wish that I had let myself be happier.

I wasn’t sure what this meant. The author explains:

“This is a surprisingly common one. Many did not realize until the end that happiness is a choice.  They had stayed stuck in old patterns and habits. The so-called 'comfort' of familiarity overflowed into their emotions, as well as their physical lives. Fear of change had them pretending to others, and to their selves, that they were content. When deep within, they longed to laugh properly and have silliness in their life again.”

This is stupid.

Happiness is a choice?

Pretending to be content?

Who are these people?

I have done a lot of stupid things in my life, and I will continue to act stupidly  on an absurdly regular basis, but failing to seek happiness and not allowing myself to laugh or be silly will not be included on the rather long list.

If I had to predict my regrets right now, they would be:

1. I did not travel enough.

2. I never pole vaulted after high school.

3. I did not spend enough time with my children.

4.  I did not get into enough fist fights.

5. I started publishing novels too late in life and did not have a chance to tell all my stories.

Thankfully, I can correct most of these if given enough time. And since I have no intention of dying, I should have plenty.

My only concern is spending enough time with my children. I fear that no matter how much time I spend with them, it will never feel like enough.

I’m not sure who will give me a chance to vault again, but perhaps stop by track practice at a local high school someday soon and ask if I could give it a shot. All I need to find is a coach who doesn’t worry about liability issues and I’ll be set.

So what if it’s been twenty years since I vaulted. I can probably still clear opening height. Right?

Art defined by dollars

A story on NPR told of artist Justine Gignac, who packages New York City garbage into plexiglas cubes and sells these cubes for a profit. He began his venture in order to prove that the packaging of a product makes a big difference in how it is perceived. Attempting to sell garbage seemed like a good way to prove his point. He began selling his cubes for $10, and customers initially purchased them as gag gifts and souvenirs.

Sales were so good that he eventually raised his price. When the cubes hit $50, customers began perceiving the cubes as art, and so he began marketing them as such.

This is the problem with art.  My wife is a huge fan of the visual arts, and though I appreciate art as well, there is simply some work that I would not characterize as art, regardless of what anyone says.  And don’t Gignac’s cubes illustrate this point?  At $10, these cubes are gag gifts. At $50, they may be worthy of a place in MOMA.

It’s why I appreciate art but tend not to embrace it.

Much like the classical music industry as well.

My two most common restaurant complaints

Elysha and I decided to share a shake at dinner tonight. “Would you like one glass and two straws?” the waitress asked.

“No,” Elysha said. “We don’t need to do that. We’re already married. Two glasses is fine.”

I was upset, having already envisioned our two smiling faces converging on the two straws in the center of the table. It got worse when the waitress sided with Elysha, informing me that it is not the 1950s and I needed to get over my disappointment.

Not nice.

This was not the first time I was the victim of the wife-and-waitress double-team, but it’s hardly my biggest restaurant complaint.

Two of my more prominent restaurant complaints include:

1.  The singing that takes place when a guest is celebrating a birthday has gotten completely out of hand. Last month Elysha and I went to Red Robin for a quick bite to eat and were forced to listen to four renditions of Happy Birthday, sung to various customers throughout the restaurant. It seems like I can’t enjoy a single meal without having to listen to a bunch of off-key waiters and waitresses sing to someone who just wants them to go away. The proliferation of this tradition is frightening. At Texas Roadhouse, the restaurant staff actually hoists the guest atop a saddle that is mounted on a rolling sawhorse as they sing.

That said, I have twice told waitresses that it was a friend’s birthday when it was not. It’s always amusing to watch their surprise as the cake is placed in front of them and the singing begins.

And once, I told the good folks at the Texas Roadhouse that it was a friend’s birthday, forcing him atop the saddle.

As far as I can tell, humiliations like these are the only good use of this otherwise ridiculous practice of singing.

2. The expediter also irritates me a great deal. Expediters are restaurant staff members who bring your meal to the table when your overworked waiter or waitress can’t get to it fast enough. Though I appreciate the idea behind the expediter, I don’t want a stranger delivering my food. It’s my waiter or waitress with whom I have established a relationship. She knows what I ordered and how I wanted it cooked. She knows that I’m drinking Diet Coke and not Coke. She is the one whose tip is dependent upon the service I receive. Asking an expediter for another drink, an extra napkin, or for a correction in your order is always a crap shoot.

I’d rather wait three minutes and have my waitress deliver my meal herself.

Admittedly, when your waitress has joined forces with your wife for less-than-noble intents, the expediter can sometimes be a welcomed change of pace.

The encore is stupid.

Does anyone else find this social dance bizarre and insulting? The concert seemingly comes to an end, the band steps off stage, yet the lights in the theater remain low. There is an unspoken expectation between the band and the audience that regardless of the quality of the performance, the crowd will remain in their seats, making a requisite amount of noise in order to coax the band back on stage, despite the knowledge of all present that the musicians intend on returning regardless of the reaction of the fans.

I’m sure that there was a time when the encore was a legitimate act of audience appreciation, when a band would genuinely end their performance and head backstage, only to be inspired by a roaring crowd to return for one more number.

But this is no longer the case. Nowadays, bands save their most well known song for the encore, and even the lighting and pyrotechnics for an encore are preprogrammed, eliminating all illusion to the authenticity or spontaneity of the moment. In fact, performers often leave their instruments on stage during the encore, only removing them after the encore is complete. This contrived interplay between audience and performer is ridiculous and should end immediately.

This strikes me as similar to the silence that now reigns between movements in an orchestral performance.

False. Pretentious. Unnecessary. Stupid.

New words in the OED

The OED announced it’s list of new words this week. 

Here are some of them, including a few thoughts of my own:

  • chill pill- a notional pill taken to make someone calm down
  • chillax- calm down and relax
  • bargainous- costing less than is usual or than might be expected; cheap or relatively cheap

I don’t like it when the OED adds words that I cannot use because doing so would make me sound stupid and/or thirteen-years old.  These three words fit this category well.  They were not meant for fully matured human beings.

  • wardrobe malfunction- an instance of a person accidentally exposing an intimate part of their body as a result of an article of clothing slipping out of position

It’s interesting that the person who first popularized this phrase did not actually experience a wardrobe malfunction but had instead underestimated the reaction of viewers to a woman exposing her breasts during a Super Bowl halftime show. 

  • fussbudget- a fussy person
  • vuvuzela- long horn blown by fans at soccer matches

My mother was using fussbudget thirty years ago.  How does it take that long for a word like fussbudget to make it into the dictionary when a word like vuvuzela gets in after one World Cup soccer tournament?

  • soft skills- personal attributes that enable someone to interact effectively and harmoniously with other people

I don’t hold these “skills” in high regard, and as a result, I find their name amusingly appropriate.  Soft skills… funny. 

Nerf skills would have been even better. 

  • cool hunter- a person whose job it is to make observations or predictions about new styles and trends

Are you kidding me?  Then I’d like to be a cool hunter hunter and eliminate this scourge from the Earth.

  • automagically- automatically and in a way that seems ingenious, inexplicable, or magical
  • catastrophizing view or present a situation as considerably worse than it actually is
  • matchy-matchy- excessively color-coordinated
  • frenemy- a person with whom one is friendly despite a fundamental dislike or rivalry

I approve of all these words and like them a lot.  I have used all except for catastrophizing, but now that I’m aware of the word, I expect that I’ll be using it a lot.  I know  a lot of people who make it a habit of catastrophizing for reasons that I never understand. 

In fact, I am probably an anti-catastrophizer, preferring to make light of most situations regardless of their severity, which has a tendency to infuriate catastrophizers.

Some people just enjoy problems.  They savor them.  Bask in their misfortune.  I sometimes wonder if they think they are in a television series, and to have a problem-free, drama-free life would be bad for their personal ratings. 

Happy and dissatisfied

In a rare ripple in our otherwise sea of marital bliss, my wife became rather annoyed with me last night. It was the final night of summer vacation, and I was lamenting the fact that I had not accomplished my goal of writing my next book in eight weeks. Hoping to use my vacation to write full time, I thought that I could easily accomplish this goal, and while I failed, I still think it would have been possible had I applied myself more. An unexpected revision of my third book and my book tour took more time from my schedule than expected, and I found it surprisingly difficult to pry myself away from my cuter-by-the-day daughter.  But perhaps with more work in the late evenings or early mornings, and maybe an earlier institution of my plan to sleep less would have allowed me to realize success.

After listening to this diatribe, Elysha fired back, declaring that my original goal was ridiculous and that I had worked more than enough during the summer and should be satisfied with the result. Furthermore, she explained, I should not be annoyed or angry with myself for not reaching my goal, because doing so was not fair to me or to her.

I understood where she was coming from, and it turns out that she has supporters.

In Leo Babauta‘s latest book, a simplicity manifesto in the age of distraction, in a chapter on “letting go of goals,”  he writers:

(Goals) are artificial — you aren’t working because you love it, you’re working because you’ve set goals.

They’re constraining — what if you want to work on something not in line with your goals?  Shouldn’t we have that freedom?

They put pressure on us to achieve, to get certain things done.  Pressure is stressful, and not always in a good way.

When we fail (and we always do), it’s discouraging.

But most of all, here’s the thing with goals: you’re never satisfied. Goals are a way of saying, “When I’ve accomplished this goal (or all these goals), I will be happy then. I’m not happy now, because I haven’t achieved my goals.” This is never said out loud, but it’s what goals really mean. The problem is, when we achieve the goals, we don’t achieve happiness. We set new goals, strive for something new.

I don’t agree with much of what he writes in regards to goal setting, but it’s his last argument that I quibble with the most, because it goes against everything that I believe.

My life philosophy goes something like this:

My hope is to always live in a perpetual state of content dissatisfaction.

Sure, I want to be happy, but I never want to find myself thoroughly satisfied with my position in life either. I wish to remain on a lifelong mission of realizing my dreams, which requires a never-ending list of unfulfilled dreams.

Friends (and perhaps my wife) have found this philosophy both bizarre and impossible, since one cannot be happy and dissatisfied. Yet I think I have somehow achieved this result. Yes, I am disappointed and annoyed with myself for not having finished my manuscript, but these feelings of discontentment do not preclude me from being happy overall.

Is this so hard to understand?

Recently, I’ve been talking about my plan to retire after twenty-five years of teaching. If I was able to make this happen, I would be retiring from the profession in thirteen years at the ripe old age of 52. When I tell my older friends about my plan, many tell me that they are already worrying about how they will fill their days after retirement and could not imagine leaving the workplace in their early fifties.

But here’s the thing:

I live in a perpetual state of content dissatisfaction. I have accomplished my childhood dream of teaching and writing for a living. But these are not my only goals. Since childhood, new goals have been piling up, and while I have continued to tackle many of them, there are some that still await my attention.  Retiring from teaching does not mean retiring from life. It simply means opening a new chapter in my life, and I have more than enough unfulfilled goals and dreams with which to fill it. My list of ideas is a mile long, and the only difficulty that I anticipate is determining where to start.

And who knows?  After twenty-five years of teaching, I may find myself wanting to teach another twenty-five, unable to give up the job that I love so much. But my interests are so varied and my desires so great that leaving the profession after a quarter century seems entirely possible as I enter my twelfth year in the classroom.

Babauta is correct when he says that when we achieve a goal, we set a new goal and strive for something new. But he is incorrect in assuming that this results in unhappiness.

Content dissatisfaction, perhaps. And yes, therefore happiness, too. At least for me.

Golden Rule, Golden Shmool

The Golden Rule doesn’t always work. I always prefer that people be direct, honest and forthright with me at all times. Brutally honest if needed. No behind-the-back gossip or back-channel suggestions through a third party. Just let me have it.

And a few of my friends actually adhere to this desire quite well, and I thank them for it.

When I do something stupid, for example, I like to be told. But when I attempt to tell someone else that they are acting stupid, they are considerably less appreciative than I usually am. In fact, I have found that the more direct and honest I am with people, the less I am appreciated.

Furthermore, my directness often results in less direct and more passive-aggressive behavior on the part of the recipient, who often chooses to speak to my wife or my boss rather than me.

Essentially, they tattle on me rather than facing more of my honesty and directness.

I can’t tell you how direct and honest this tattling then makes me, thus propagating a vicious circle that never ends well.

So much for the stupid Golden Rule.

Oh, The Golden Rule also failed miserably when I was a single man on the dating scene. The idea that “I hit on you because I want you to hit on me” was a complete flop as well.

CAPS LOCK

What is the point of the goddamn Caps Lock button? And why must it be as almost as large as the Shift key. And why did the morons who designed this keyboard put the damn button beside the letter A, making it a button that I am constantly striking by mistake. Who the hell uses Caps Lock?

Why is it so big?

Why isn't the button written in caps?

Why not put it beside the letter Z?

Or somewhere above the row of numbers?

And why not shrink the thing to a reasonable size?

If I had my way, I’d force the designer of my keyboard to swallow this dreadful key and laugh as it lodges somewhere in the idiot’s throat.

How’s that for a design standard? If you can’t swallow the key without choking, it’s too big.

I’m upset.  Perhaps I’m overreacting a bit.