Why didn’t someone show me before I went to college?

Based upon yearly income, elementary school teacher is the worst paying of all college degrees. While I believe that teachers are underpaid, I am also quick to remind colleagues that teachers work about 185 days a year, whereas most professionals (and perhaps all other professionals) work 240-250 days a year.

If an elementary school teacher earning $33,000 a year (the national average) went from 185 to 250 working days in a year, he or she would probably be earning an average salary in the neighborhood of $45,000.

Still not enough considering the importance of the job and level of ongoing education required (it costs more for a teacher to become licensed in the state of Connecticut than it does an attorney), but enough to get the elementary teaching profession out of the top five worst paying of all college degrees and into the top paying jobs without a college degree.

Uhg.

I love teaching and cannot imagine doing anything else, but when I see these income statistics and continue to write checks for education loans that I am still paying as a result of the Master’s degree that was required in order to keep teaching, I have to wonder what the hell I was thinking.

You say yes. I say no. But do I really mean no?

When deciding upon the next novel to write, I solicited the counsel of several friends, and one of them is dead set against one of my ideas. After reading the first two chapters of this proposed novel, she has outlined in great detail why this would not make a good story. Her husband, upon hearing about her protests, asked why she continues to lobby so hard against the idea. “It will just make Matt want to write it more,” he said.

I smiled at his supposition, but since she told it to me, I have been thinking:

Is this really what people think of me?

Yesterday I was attending the birthday party of a two year-old. As I attempted to scientifically debunk the superstition that it’s bad luck not to taste the birthday cake, Elysha explained, “Matt’s not happy unless someone is annoyed with him.”

Again, I was left wondering:

Is this what people, including my wife, think of me?

And even worse, is any of this true?

contrarian

Suddenly I find myself questioning my motives at every turn.

For example, I was talking to someone recently about my belief that teachers should have the right to allow their students to call them by their first names. I have yet to make this offer to my students because of possible  administrative and collegial ramifications, but to enforce the formality of titles upon students has always seemed arcane, artificial, distancing, and unnecessary to me.

But is this really my rationale?

Perhaps this desire is born from personal experience. In high school and throughout college, I was permitted to refer to many of my teachers and professors by their first names, and almost all of my favorite teachers from this time allowed this. Maybe my desire to have my students call me Matt is simply an unconscious attempt to replicate something that I enjoyed as a student. Or perhaps I am attempting to emulate the behaviors of those I admired the most.

Or worse, maybe this desire is simply an attempt to do what others would not want. Perhaps my contrarian streak runs so deep that I can no longer distinguish between something I truly believe and my unwavering desire to swim against the stream and, in the words of my wife, annoy people.

I find this possibility terribly disconcerting. While I have no qualms with assuming a contrarian position and annoying people in the process, the last thing I want would be for my life to be unconsciously ruled by this desire.

I like to think that any unpopular or divergent positions that I hold are the result of logical reasoning and my willingness to look beyond social norms, tradition and expectations, regardless of what others may think of me as a result.

But could I have become a simple input-output device?

You say A. I say B.

You say yes. I say no.

You believe this. I believe that.

I would hate to think that I have spent this much time annoying people, suffering their spats of vitriol and enduring their occasional acts of vengeance, all because of an automated, unconscious, and previously unknown response to external stimuli.

Have I become the equivalent of a human Venus fly trap?

No silly exercises from this life coach

As a life coach, I’ve only had three clients (and only one paying client), so my experience in the field is admittedly limited, but exercises like this strike me as more style than substance. From the Mommy Beta blog:

Take a few minutes and fill out The Wheel of Life (below). The eight sections of the wheel represent balance. Rank your level of satisfaction with each area of life by placing a number from 1 to 10 in each (10 being very satisfied and 1 being not so satisfied). It's way to see where you're most satisfied and where you could focus your attention on a little more.

 

 

Are you kidding me? A Wheel of Life?

This is the kind of activity that I was required to do in high school during Peer Education when class discussion sucked. A time-wasting filler for those awkwardly silent days.

Your life may not be balanced, but if so, you should damn well know which areas need more attention and which areas do not, particularly if balance is being determined based upon your own personal preferences (which, by the way, seems like a rather stupid way to evaluate balance in the first place).

If you can’t tell which areas of your life leave you the least satisfied without the use of this wheel, we need to discuss basic cognitive functioning and self awareness.

Or perhaps I should just hit you over the head with a wheel.

What should one expect from the Wheel of Life expect?

“Why look! I rated myself rather low in the areas of Romance and Personal Growth. I had no idea that my levels of satisfaction were disproportionately lower in these areas in comparison to the rest. Perhaps I should join Match.com and start taking pottery classes. Thanks, Wheel of Life!”

Stupid, stupid, stupid.

As a life coach, how is this Wheel of Life supposed to be helpful? If my client rates his satisfaction at a 10 in the Health section of the pie but is grossly overweight and has high blood pressure, am I supposed to be pleased?

If my client has no plan for retirement but is happy with his Money section because he wants to live in the moment, should I pat him on the back and send him on his way?

And could someone please tell me what the hell Physical Environment means and how I expected to achieve balance in this regard? I have a foot of snow on my front yard and cannot play golf for at least two months, so my physical environment sucks right now.

But what am I supposed to do about it?

Plan a trip to Florida?

Take a hair dryer to some of the snow banks around the eighteenth green?

More importantly, I didn’t need a Wheel of Life to tell me that my Physical Environment sucks, if this is what Physical Environment even means. I can just use a window, which requires considerably less effort and time and doesn’t make me feel like such a dumb ass for using.

I know. I might be a little rough around the edges, but admit it:

You want me as your life coach.

Overslept

My wife woke up and looked over at me.

“I’ve never been in bed with you when it’s light outside.”

She’s right. 

I climbed out of bed at 5:30 this morning, but upon realizing that I had somehow developed a sore throat and headache overnight, I went back to bed in hopes of staving off the illness.  

But this may be the first time in a long, long time that I slept after sunrise.  

A few minutes later my belly growled in a way that I have never heard it growl before. 

I swear it was asking me if I had died in my sleep.

It does not stand for quintessential

How have I managed to get through life without questioning what the Q in Q-tips stands for? Qtips

It shocks me that I managed to get through life without discovering that the Q stands for quality, which is completely stupid.

Quality tip?

Even so, it’s better than the original name of the product:

Baby Gays.

I could find no explanation as to the origin of this name.

Oh, and for the record, you are not supposed to clean your ears with Q-tips. I have yet to meet a doctor who won’t tell you to avoid sticking anything in your ears.

Even Q-tips own website does not list the cleaning of the inner ear as a recommended use.

I suspect that if people actually followed this doctor and company warning, however, Q-tips might go out of business.

I want my $25,000 back, damn it.

In 1992 I was arrested, tried and eventually found not guilty of a crime that I did not commit. I’ve written about some of the details of the case before if you are interested.

In hopes of writing a memoir someday, I tried to obtain the transcript of my arraignment and trial from the Massachusetts courthouse where these proceedings were held. It turns out that those transcripts no longer exist.  Audio transcripts, which are how the court’s proceedings are recorded today, must only be saved for two years following a case, and anything prior to 1996 no longer exists in any form save a single sheet of paper indicating the determination of the court.

I was pretty disappointed. I recall a great deal about the trial and the days leading up to it, but I had hoped to have an exact record of that frightening time in my life in order to gain a better understanding of how certain things happened.

The part about the trial that still bothers me the most was the way in which I was denied a court-appointed attorney. At the time of my arrest, I was earning $24,000 a year as a McDonald’s manager. I had recently purchased a 1992 Toyota Tercel. These two factors, and especially the car, caused the judge at my arraignment to declare me fit to retain my own counsel.

I tried to explain that my arrest would surely result in the loss of my job and a complete loss of income, but the judge’s fixation on my “brand new car” left me without legal counsel.

I never quite understood how this was possible.

court appointed attorney

So I contacted an attorney and former prosecutor this week to ask how this could have happened, and she explained that legal counsel is appointed based upon financial need. “You need to be pretty close to the poverty line to be assigned an attorney by the court,” she explained.

Even though I would be jobless and homeless less than a month after my arrest, I was not technically near the poverty level at the time of my arraignment, and therefore the judge was entirely within his rights to deny me counsel.

Without an attorney or parents to advise me about the possibility of reapplying for legal counsel after I had lost my job and home, I was stuck.

But regardless of my financial standing at the time of my arraignment, I have a serious problem with this poverty-line requirement.

If you are arrested for a crime that you did not commit and you are not living at or near the poverty line, you are required to pay for your own legal counsel. This means that when and if you are found not guilty, there is no way of recovering the thousands of dollars spent defending your innocence.

In my case, a single police officer ignored the assertions of my employer that I was innocent and arrested me for grand larceny, even after several company officials assured the officer that the money had been lost and not stolen.

This decision sent my life into a two year spiral which resulted:

  • The loss of my home
  • The loss of my job
  • A three year suspension of my college aspirations
  • My inability to leave the state (which was initially planned at the time of my arrest)
  • $25,000 in legal fees
  • Two years spent working eighteen hours a day at two different jobs in order to recover financially, find a new home and pay my legal bills

In addition, it was while working at the second of these two jobs that I was robbed at gunpoint, beaten, tortured and left suffering for years with post-traumatic stress disorder.

It’s bad enough that a police officer’s incorrect decision can do so much damage to a person’s life, but to then be told that you are required to spend thousands of dollars defending your innocence with no means of restitution once that innocence has been proven is not the way the legal system should operate. Saddling innocent people with enormous debt after they have done nothing wrong is something that we should not accept.

I understand that police officers and prosecutors can make mistakes, but just as the guilty must pay for their mistakes, the justice system should pay when they make mistakes of their own. There was no way that the Massachusetts criminal justice system could have made up for the two years of turmoil that their mistakes cost me, but is it too much to ask that they cover the legal bills after denying me legal counsel?

I don’t think so.

In the end, I got lucky. Rather than going to trial, I could have accepted a plea agreement for a suspended sentence and a fine considerably less than the legal fees that I eventually paid, and I suspect that most people in my circumstances would have done exactly that despite their innocence.

At the time, my attorney said that most people would have accepted the deal and moved on with their life.

I nearly did.

How many people in my position; innocent, homeless, jobless, and without any support of family, would find a way to hire legal counsel, work two full time jobs in order to pay for it, and ultimately prove their innocence?

But for those of us who find ourselves in these bewildering, frightening circumstances, trapped in a miasma not of our own making, with the full financial resources and legal expertise of the state pitted against us, shouldn’t there be a path to financial restitution once the fault is found to lie not with us but in the hands of a police officer and a prosecutor who arrested and tired an innocent man?

I think so.

Intelligentsia

Yesterday a friend texted me this message: What is epistemological theory?

I gave a brief definition via text while waiting for a haircut. It was the most intellectual series of text messages I have ever had.

This morning Elysha told me that she dreamt about the epigraph of The Great Gatsby, which she has memorized in real life and in her dreams:

"Then wear the gold hat, if that will move her; If you can bounce high, bounce for her too, Till she cry "Lover, gold-hatted, high-bouncing lover, I must have you!" – Thomas Parke D’Invilliers

I have some seriously intellectual people in my life.

A joyous response to the misery of others

A study released by Stanford University shows that Facebook users often perceive their friends as having more fulfilling social and emotional lives. As a result, people end up feeling more lonely, isolated and depressed. facebook-cry

My reaction to Facebook has always been the opposite. Given the propensity to complain or allude to vague personal problems (with the hope that someone will engage), I always find Facebook rather uplifting.

Joyous even.

Admittedly, I often access Facebook through other platforms, so I don't spend as much time reading my Facebook feed as it might seem, but still, it never takes long to find someone who is upset.

While not all status updates are littered with whining and complaining, there are generally enough moans and groans related to the weather, work, children, the lack of sleep, travel snafus and illness to send me from my computer with a genuine skip in my step.

Facebook is my daily pick-me-up. A reminder of why I am so happy to be me.

Perhaps I’m just friends with the right people.

Or the wrong people.

Or the right people.

I am at a loss for words. I simply cannot believe what I have just seen.

I cannot believe what I just saw.

Did you watch the State of the Union speech on Tuesday?

Do you remember President Obama’s well received jokes regarding airport pat-downs and smoked salmon?

These jokes got laughs. The salmon joke got a lot of laughs.

Here is video of the salmon joke from the speech:

And here is Fox News’s redubbing of the speech, minus the laughs (and with the added sound of crickets where the laughs once were), all done in order to criticize the President’s jokes for falling flat. 

I honestly cannot believe what I just saw.

Did Fox News think that people who watched the speech wouldn’t remember the laughs that the President’s jokes got?

Was this deliberate alternation of the video worth the ten minutes of conversation that Fox and Friends had?

Did Fox News believe that this misrepresentation of the State of the Union address would damage President Obama’s chances for leading effectively and getting reelected?

Was it worth what little reputation they have left?

When are the adults going to return to broadcasting?

You hurt my feelings. I’m taking my toys and going home.

UCONN booster Robert Burton's sent a scathing letter to school athletic director Jeff Hathaway indicating that he was upset that Hathaway did not follow his advice in the hiring of Paul Pasqualoni as head football coach earlier this month. The chief executive officer of Greenwich, Conn.-based Burton Capital Management wants the school to return $3 million in donations and remove his family name from its football complex because he says he was shut out of discussions about the selection of a new football coach.

The letter is a priceless piece of pontificating petulance, and I am only surprised that someone as wealthy as Burton would not seek the counsel of a public relations professional before sending it.

I’ve excerpted a few of my favorite paragraphs for your reading pleasure, along with some commentary of my own.

“When I called you on Monday, January I made two things very clear to you, as the largest donor in the UConn football program. I told you that I wanted to be involved in the hiring process for the new coach. I also gave you my insight about who would be a good fit for the head coaching position as well as who would not. For someone who has given over $7,000,000 to the football program/university, I do not feel as though these requests were asking for too much. Your lack of response on either of these requests tells me that you do not respect my point of view or value my opinion.”

This paragraph, the first in the letter, is the most curious to me. If Burton already offered Hathaway his “insight about who would be a good fit for the head coaching position,” wasn’t he afforded his requested input?

What else did he want? A seat on the interview committee?

I am fed up with you as a manager because you did not let the hiring process take place in an open manner. You and your committee of three talked to some coaches and made a critical decision about who you were going to hire without input from knowledgeable people who care about the program. I believe that you are not qualified to be a Division 1 AD and l would have fired you a long time ago. You do not have the skills to manage and cultivate new donors or the ability to work with coaches. It is our intent to let the correct people know that you did not listen to your number one football donor and you led a flawed process in the search for UConn's football coach.

“…you’re number one football donor”.

Burton sounds pretty proud of that. Doesn’t he?

He also reminds me of a third grader, threatening to spread a mean rumor across the playground. Simply substitute “correct people” with “popular kids” and you have yourself a playground bullying situation.

What you don't know about me, other than being a college football player/captain and NFL draft pick, is that I know more football coaches than the majority of Athletic Directors in America. I was a GA in Graduate School and worked on my in Tennessee and Alabama, was also a scout for the Minnesota Vikings while in grad school. I am fully qualified to assess coaches and their ability to match up with the university's needs, and have done so for football programs from Vanderbilt to New Haven, as well as several schools in the Ohio Valley Conference and Big Ten.

This is my favorite paragraph. Who knew that Robert Burton was more knowledgeable about the hiring of football coaches than the majority of Athletic Directors in America?

Robert Burton. That’s who.

I think the University of Connecticut should inscribe this paragraph on the side of their newest athletic facility, so that everyone can know about Burton’s former football heroics and his extensive experience in the NFL as both a draftee an a scout. Perhaps that would make this football mastermind happy.

As soon as you find a new donor, I want you to return the $3 million I gave you for the Burton Family Football Complex, as well as the additional funds I gave Randy and the football department for pictures and other art and the new audio system in the weight room. We plan to donate these funds to another university that supports our objectives and goals. After we get our money back, you can take our name off the Complex.

This is the most disgusting paragraph in the entire letter. It’s the paragraph that lets the reader know that charitable donations made by Robert Burton are never charitable and are never made without substantial strings attached.

Lastly, don't underestimate me or what I have outlined and requested in this document. I have already secured legal counsel from several law firms. If you are looking for a fight, then you have selected the right family. You have hurt and embarrassed the Burton family for the last time. We want our money and respect back.

This paragraph, the last in the letter, is the most baffling.

First, Burton marked his letter Personal and Confidential, but even I know that any letter sent to a state university is subject to the Freedom of Information Act, which is how the letter eventually leaked to the press. So if he has already secured legal counsel as he claims, how would any decent attorney allow such an inflammatory and reputation-destroying letter to be sent in the first place?

And the last sentence is the best. It’s priceless, really. Those seven words capture the essence of Burton and his understanding of this situation perfectly.

“We want our money and respect back.”

Have two more incongruous idea ever been pushed together into the same sentence?

We would like you to return our charitable donation to the University and simultaneously earn back the respect of the community to which the money was going to serve?

The letter itself is a guarantee that any respect that Burton still had is forever gone, and his demand for the cash is simply icing on the cake.

I am the father of a two-year old.

My little girl turned two years old yesterday.

Here is what I wrote to her on the day that she was born:

_______________________________________________

Our day began yesterday, at 11:53 PM, when you mother awoke me from twenty minutes of glorious sleep to inform me that her water had broken. In fact, it was still breaking. I could hear the splashing from the bed as I opened my eyes. Despite the hours of birthing class and hundreds of pages that Mommy and I had read on pregnancy, we both stared at one another and asked, “What do we do?”

In truth, Mommy tried to tell me that she was in labor around 11:00 PM.  I didn’t believe her.  Earlier that day, the brutal, possibly hedonist midwife had told me that there was “no mistaking contractions.”  Since mom said that she thought it might be contractions, I assumed that she was experiencing cramps and that we should probably not go to the hospital yet.

Turns out I was wrong. 

After loading up the car and waiting for Jane to arrive to pick up Kaleigh, we were off, leaving the house at 12:30 AM.

Seven minutes later, we arrived at the hospital, and I dropped Mommy off in order to park the car. I said, “Don’t wait for me. Just go up.” 

“There’ll be no waiting for you” she replied and exited the car.

I admit that I secretly hoped that by the time I made it up to the sixth floor, you would be well on your way out.

No such luck.

Mommy was filling out paperwork when I arrived in the delivery center, and it was at this time that I finally understood the degree of Mommy’s pain. As she was being asked questions, her responses were not very coherent. Of course, her contractions were coming every three to four minutes, which explains the pain.

After being led to our room, we met Cassie, the first of two nurses who we would come to adore throughout the process. Cassie was with us throughout the evening, making us comfortable and helping us to catch a few hours of sleep. After arriving, we learned that Mommy was almost entirely effaced but not dilated at all. We were shocked. On the way over, we took wagers on how dilated she would be. She said 4 centimeters would make her happy, and I was hoping for 7.

Zero was a disappointment.

Thankfully, our humanitarian doctor, who doesn’t believe that women should ever suffer through childbirth, offered to administer the epidural immediately, even though birthing class instructors informed us that this would not be done before 4 centimeters. This was the first of what we discovered to be several false statements made by birthing class instructors, including their assertion that the hospital had no Wi-Fi, which I am using at this moment.

I left the room for the epidural (though Cassie said I could stay, which my birthing instructor said would never happen), and even though Mommy hasn’t said much about it, it seemed to go well. The anesthesiologist was a bit of a jerk, but otherwise, the needle, the meds, and all the horrifying aspects of this procedure went off without a hitch. Mommy was terrified during this process, possibly more than any other time in her life, but she held up like a trooper.

With the epidural on board, the pain vanished, the lights were turned off, and Mommy and I managed to sleep for a couple fitful hours. The chair that I attempted to sleep in was a device that harkened back to the Spanish Inquisition in terms of its torture on my neck and back, but later I discovered that it was actually designed to open into a bed.  I managed to sleep soundly for an hour or two.

We slept from about 2:00-4:00, when Cassie checked Mommy again and found her fully effaced and 4 centimeters dilated. Lights went out again until 6:00, when Cassie checked and found Mommy fully dilated.

Hooray. I expected a baby before breakfast and said as much.

Mommy began pushing at 6:30, but in the midst of a shift change, in which Cassie left us and Catherine took over, it was decided to allow you to drop some more on your own before resuming to push.

When Catherine first appeared, we didn’t know who she was, but being the woman she is, your mother immediately requested her name and rank, and we learned that Cassie was leaving us. Cassie was wonderful; an easy going, friendly, and warm woman with three young kids of her own who was perfect for helping us to rest and relax during the night. Catherine was warm and friendly as well, but she was also a bit of a drill sergeant, specific and demanding in her orders, and it was just what your Mommy needed when she began pushing again around 8:00.

This was the hardest time for your mother. She pushed consistently from 8:00 until 11:30, but because of the placement of your mother’s pubic bone and the angle of your head, you simply would not come out. The vacuum was attempted briefly, but at last, it was determined that a c-section would need to be done.

A few interesting notes from the pushing:

Several times, Catherine encouraged Mommy to find some anger with which to help push. “Get mad,” she would say. “Find something to be angry about.” Your mother continually asserted that she had nothing in her life with which to be angry. Finally, Catherine acknowledged that she was dealing with the sweetest person on the planet.

Your mother never yelled at me and never uttered a single word of profanity during the entire process.

Throughout the pushing, I was receiving and sending texts to your grandmother, Justine, and Cindy, who were all dying to find out what was going on. I also managed to update my Facebook and Twitter accounts throughout the morning and work on my novel in between contractions. 

When the vacuum was brought into play, the room filled with about eight doctors and nurses. At one point, a nurse asked me to hold your mom’s leg, which I had been doing all morning. Catherine said, “Not him. He doesn’t get off of that stool.”  Though I didn’t feel queasy or weak in the knees, she saw something in me that indicated otherwise. Later I was sent out of the room to “drink some juice.”

When the decision was made to extract you via c-section, things got fast and furious.  I left your mom for the first time that day in order to don a pair of scrubs while she was rolled into the operating room and prepped. It was at this time that I was forced to remove my Superman tee-shirt, which had been specifically chosen for the event. I wanted your first glimpses of me to be reminiscent of the man of steel.

The best laid plans of mice and men.

When I entered the OR, the doctors were already working on your mother, and I inadvertently caught a view of her before I was ushered to a stool behind the screen and told not to move.

It is a view that I would not wish upon my worst enemy, and it is one that I wish I could forget. 

Sitting beside your mom’s head and the three anesthesiologists who were busy injecting Mommy with more medicine than I could have ever imagined, I listened and waited with her. I t took about fifteen minutes before I heard your first cries and one of the doctors leaned over the screen and said, “Here it comes. Do you want to know if it’s a boy or a girl?”

“Yes,” we said in unison.

“It looks like… a girl,” he said, and immediately thereafter, the docs behind the screen began asserting the same. We began crying while we listened to your cry and caught our first glimpses of you as a nurse was preparing to weigh you. A couple minutes later, after managing a 9/9 on your apgar scores, you were handed to me, the first time I have ever held an infant without the protection of a sofa and many cushions.

You were beautiful.

Because of the position that Mommy was still in, she wasn’t able to see you well until Catherine finally took you from my nervous arms, flipped you upside down like a football, and held your face to hers.

I’ll never forget this moment.

Your mom was forced to remain on the table, arms outstretched and pinned, for more than an hour while the doctors stitched her up. She began to go a little stir crazy for a while, unable to move and shivering uncontrollably, and we tried to calm her by massaging her shoulders and rubbing her arms.

When the surgery was over, you were finally handed to Mommy. The two of you were rolled into Recovery while I had the pleasure of telling your grandparents, Aunty Emily, and soon-to-be Uncle Michael all about you. There were many tears. Your grandfather laughed, your grandmother cried, and in keeping with her character, Emily was indignant over her inability to see you and her sister immediately.

She is one demanding babe.

I left them for a quick bite at Friendly’s but fell down along the way, the lack of sleep and food getting the better of me.  Two nurses ran over and helped me up, and I was soon enjoying a chicken sandwich and French fries, wondering what I was supposed to do next. 

It’s almost 9:00 PM, and we are now sitting in our room, resting and chatting. You are asleep and have been for the past few hours. I must leave soon in order to go home so that I can teach tomorrow and use my time off when you and your mom are at home.

My students will be thrilled to see your photos and hear all about you.

For your mother, the hours of pushing were her greatest challenge of the day.

For me, the greatest challenge will be leaving this room tonight and not taking you with me. I want nothing more than to hold you in my arms for the next week.

We love you so much, little one. Welcome to the world.

Clara 001 IMG_0488 IMG_2015 IMG_2017 IMG_2021 IMG_2022

Maybe not a rapist, but the guy can’t even get a date

Ben Roethlisberger was never convicted or even charged with the crime to which he stood accused, and as someone who was once arrested and tried for a crime he did not commit, I am sensitive to this fact. I am the annoying person who is always inserting the word allegedly into people’s hyperbolic and emotional statements about well-known defendants.

You should have heard me during the OJ Simpson trial.

I also have a couple of friends who are Steelers fans, and they become rather irate when someone implies that their quarterback is a rapist.

So fine. The man is innocent until proven guilty.

But what about this:

What kind of NFL quarterback and Super Bowl champion can’t get a date without the help of his thuggish friends? Even if Roethlisberger is innocent of sexual assault, he was still waiting in the men’s room of a seedy nightclub while his minions sought out young girls who might be interested in spending some quality time with the multi-millionaire football superstar.

In the bathroom.

Is it really this hard for an NFL quarterback to get a date?

I know it sounds trite, but this fact alone causes me to question everything about the guy. Anyone who prefers his dates to be drunk and in the men’s room has something seriously wrong with him, and he is the last person who I would want leading my football team.

He may not be a rapist, but can anyone argue that Roethlisberger is at least pathetic and disgusting?

Assigned seating sucks

I learned an important lesson last week. I arrived early to a workshop in order to sit at the table of my choice. This was the second day of training, and so I was familiar with the classroom layout from the previous day’s training. I knew that I would be spending the next seven hours in this classroom, and I wanted to position myself in a location where I could be most effective.

I chose a table in the rear corner of the room. This was a position that afforded me a view of the entire room as well as both exits. This was similar to the position that I take in every room whenever possible, whether it be a conference room, a library reading room, a classroom, a faculty lunch room or a restaurant. As a sufferer of post traumatic stress disorder, I am most comfortable when I can see everyone in the room and have no one sitting behind me. I also like to keep all entrances and exits within my field of vision at all times.

When I am unable to establish this position in the room, I am uncomfortable. I feel unsafe. My focus and attention suffers.

After taking a seat in a preferred position, the instructor announced that she was going to randomly shift our positions in the room. As a result, I ended up in the worst seat possible in terms of my needs. I was placed in the front center of the room, with my back to a door and half of the people in the room.

I could not have been placed in a worse spot.

assigned seats

The workshop was designed to provide us with teaching strategies for specific types of learners, and early on during the first day of training, the instructor discussed the process of reducing the affective filter for students in order to improve learning. The affective filter is comprised of the barriers that interfere or prevent learning from taking place. A lack of motivation, inappropriate behaviors, an unwillingness to participate, and the undervaluing of education are all factors that can raise the affective filter in a student.

Another factor, it turns out, is a utter disregard for the seating preferences of adults. I purposely arrived early to the training in order to ensure myself a spot where I could be most effective, and then, for no discernible reason, the instructor randomly assigned me a new location in the room, leading to a rapid increase in my affective filter.

I was angry. I was annoyed. I was nervous. I was unable to muster maximum focus and effort to the task at hand.

All of that makes for one hell of an affective filter.

Why did the instructor do this?

I’m not sure.

Perhaps she believed that breaking up the previous day’s groups would reduce ancillary chatter and increase attentiveness. Except the previous day’s training had been nearly free of any side conversations, so if this was the justification for her decision, it was not based upon any evidence. In truth, she was an outstanding instructor who effectively established group norms during the first fifteen minutes of the workshop, thus eliminating most of the distracting and off-task behaviors.

In short, we were quite attentive on the first day of training.

Also, if there was ancillary chatter or a lack of focus amongst our group, the solution would not be to change our seating. This is what ineffective teachers do to solve behavioral problems. I frequently explain to my student teachers that misbehavior and inattentiveness is not a function of geography. If the kids aren’t listening, you are doing something wrong. So even if we had been a bad audience during the previous day, moving our positions in the room would not have corrected the problem.

Later in the day, we were engaged in activities that required four or five people per table, but asking participants to sit in groups of four or five while honoring their choice of seat in the room could have easily been done.

And before you start wondering if this need for specific seating is restricted solely to PTSD sufferers, two other participants expressed displeasure in their seating assignment to me during the day. One woman was placed at a table near the windows and complained that she was cold all day.

“I would’ve sat on the other side of the room, away from the windows, if I had been given a choice.”

Another told me that she was envious of my seat in the front of the classroom because when she is sitting in the back of a classroom, she tends to “zone out.”  She needs to be close to the action to maintain focus.

Even in my fifth grade classroom, students have choice of seating. While I determine their table assignment on a month-to-month basis, students can choose from any of the eight desks that comprise the table. They negotiate, collaborate, compromise, and occasionally cut deals in order to obtain the spot that makes them them happiest.

Accommodating personal preferences is simply the right thing to do. My philosophy has always been to give students as much choice and as much freedom as possible, and I try to remove myself from the decision-making process in the classroom whenever I can.

The less I say and the less I do, the more my students learn.

A lesson this otherwise effective instructor could do well to learn.

My daughter may be in communication with aliens

Yesterday morning Clara began systematically removing balls from the ball pit and placing them in various kitchen accouterments. image image

Later in the day, at her birthday party at her aunt’s house, she did this:

image image

Remember Richard Dreyfuss’s character and his obsession with Devil’s Tower in Close Encounters of the Third Kind? Dreyfuss’s character spent hours creating models of a mountain that he had never seen before, in potting soil, clay and most famously, mashed potatoes. Until he saw an image of the mountain on a news broadcast, he had no idea what he was doing or why.

For those of you not familiar with the film, Devil’s Mountain was the ultimate landing site of the alien spaceship.

Clara’s behavior with the balls and the pretzels reminded me of Close Encounters of the Third Kind. Inexplicable, seemingly obsessive, varying in medium, and yet somehow somehow methodical and with a sense of order and purpose as well.

Maybe it’s a sign?

My wife, who is afraid of aliens and even the thought of them, will not be happy to hear my suppositions.

Sometimes she’s a little too witty

I’m reading Stephen King’s new short story collection, All Dark, No Stars. The final story in the book is about a woman who discovers that her husband of twenty-five years is a serial killer. Pretty creepy. The guy is an accountant, a father and a Cub Scout leader. And apparently the brutal killer of young women.

I told Elysha earlier today that I never want to find out that she is a serial killer.

“Don’t worry,” she said. “You’d never find out.”

Amusing. But a little creepy, too.