Strange things afoot at the Circle K

Photographer and artist Paho Mann has photographed almost two dozen re-inhabited Circle K convenience stores in the Phoenix, New Mexico area.  As the company began moving its stores to more profitable locations in the 1990s, “the shells left by this migration were filled by small businesses, each inhabiting an architecturally identical structure. The new occupants painted, put up a new signs, and modified windows and doors.”

The result is a fascinating look at the creativity and individuality of local business people and provides an intriguing look at the history of the region. 

It’s also flat-out kooky, a sensibility that often appeals to me.

I can’t explain it, but ideas and images like this inspire me like few others.  I look at one of these re-imagined Circle K’s and think that I could probably write a novel about each one.  I can’t help but imagine the people working inside, and just like that, characters begin to take shape in my mind. 

Also, for connoisseurs of the film classic Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure, the Circle K brings back some rather fond memories as well. 

We can’t possibly be this desperate for ideas

Out of all the possible movies that could be made, based upon any number of books, musicals, plays, television series or even (God forbid) original concepts , do we really need film based upon the board game Risk?

Last time I checked, Risk has no characters, no plot, and no compelling hook.

What’s next? 

A movie based upon Boggle?

Hungry Hungry Hippos?

Uno?

A day at the movies

My wife and I enjoyed the rare double feature today, managing to squeeze in Zombieland and The Informant all before 3:30 PM.  Zombieland turned out to be a private screening and The Informant had only one other couple in the theater with us.

Despite the dearth of eyeballs, both were excellent films.  Zombieland is outstanding.  Dare I say perfect.

The Informant, based upon a true story that I first heard on This American Life, was also very good.  I thought that the soundtrack and the overall pitch of the movie were a little off, but the story and performances were great.   

Seeing back-to-back movies, my wife and I were also subjected to a large number of movie trailers, including two different trailers for the upcoming disaster film 2012.  The trailer attached to Zombieland was a less than hopeful view of the destruction of the world, whereas the trailer attached to The Informant focused upon mankind’s continued survival against great odds.

Interesting how Hollywood views the audiences for Zombieland and The Informant as very different sets of people.    

I also noticed that the trailer to Zombieland, as it appears on the film’s official website, shows an alternate scene from the movie.  In the online trailer, a zombie-stripper is wearing considerably more clothing that in the actual film.

More movie trailer manipulation than I would have ever imagined.  

Speaking of movie trailers, my wife nearly cried upon viewing this movie trailer this afternoon.

Naturally, I did not.

A question of origin

When Darth Vader is chasing Luke Skywalker down the trench of the Death Star in Star Wars: A New Hope, he notes that “the Force is strong with this one.” Shouldn’t he be more alarmed with this observation? Less than twenty years earlier, Vader slaughtered every Jedi youngling in the Jedi Temple, effectively ending the possibility of any future Jedi.

When he encounters a pilot who is strong with the Force, doesn’t he have to wonder why this guy even exists?

These are the things that I dream about at night.

Uncomfortable plot summaries

From postmodernbarney.com comes a list of Uncomfortable Plot Summaries.  Deconstructed and amusing summaries of film plots.  Here are a few of my favorites from a lengthy list:  

BATMAN: Wealthy man assaults the mentally ill.

BEAUTY AND THE BEAST: Peasant girl develops Stockholm Syndrome.

FERRIS BUELLER’S DAY OFF: Amoral narcissist makes world dance for his amusement.

RED DAWN: Despite shock-and-awe tactics, a superior occupying force is no match for a tenacious sect of terrorist insurgents.

SPIDER-MAN: Nerd gets bitten by spider, complains about how this ruins his life for years to come

STAR WARS: EMPIRE STRIKES BACK: Boy is abused by alien, kisses sister, attempts patricide.

Yesterday I saw THE TIME TRAVELR’S WIFE: Genetic disorder leads to man slaughter.

I’d offer up an uncomfortable plot summary for SOMETHING MISSING, but I wouldn’t want to ruin the end for those of you who haven’t finished reading it yet.

Star Trek: Coincidentally flawed

In 1997 I sent a letter to Steven Spielberg suggesting that he hire me as the Common Sense Director for his movies. I explained that my role would be to point out the silly, avoidable flaws that seem to plague so many films, his included. It was probably in reference to Jurassic Park, a film that he directed and was seriously flawed.

For example, why breed dangerous velociraptors if their enclosure provides no possible view of the animal to the public? In fact, why not just breed plant-eating dinosaurs and dispense with any concerns from investors and insurance carriers that hound the owner of the park at the beginning of the story? Hell, why bother stocking your park with carnivorous monsters at all? Aren’t brontosauruses and triceratops cool enough? And why send all the employees of your island-bound park home every night by boat instead of providing permanent housing for at least some of them? It’s an animal park. Should it really be left unattended every night?

The list goes on and on.

Granted, I understand why these elements had to be in place for the story to work, but at least take a moment in the film to explain the reasoning behind these decisions, otherwise things just seem too silly and improbable.

I tell you all this because I saw the new Star Trek movie today, and while I enjoyed the film, it was most definitely flawed, and once again, avoidably so. Granted, it didn’t involve Kirk and Spock traveling back in time to borrow whales from twentieth century Earth or a Voyager space probe gaining consciousness and threatening to destroy Earth, so there was no place to go but up.

But still, it had its problems, most of them occurring in the middle of the film, and from here, I must warn you that the rest of this post will include spoilers.

First, I must say that I went to the movie alone, just my second trip to the theater since my daughter was born. It was an 11 AM matinee and I was the only one in the theater. Buoyed by the thought of a private screening, I left my cell phone on, removed my shoes, switched seats several times, and cheered at certain parts of the film, jut because I could.

Things were off to a fine start.

And the movie was good as well. Things were going along nicely, lots of action and adventure, when Spock, the acting captain of the Enterprise, decided that instead of tossing an insubordinate Kirk into the brig for resisting arrest, he would instead place the unconscious cadet in an escape capsule and send him into temporary exile on an unnamed frozen planet.

Seemed a little extreme to me when a perfectly good jail cell is probably just two or three decks below, but I’ll let this one go for now.

Fortunately, Kirk’s escape capsule lands within walking distance of two people who will prove instrumental to his eventual triumph. In fact, these are probably the only two people in the universe who could possibly help Kirk in any way: the aged Spock from the future, who steps in just in time to save Kirk from being eaten from a monster that does not seem suited to the planet’s frozen climate, and Scotty, the only man in the universe capable of transporting Kirk back onto the Enterprise while it is moving at warp speed.

I found this set of circumstances a little hard to swallow. Added to this, it was also oddly convenient that:

a. Both of these men would be on the same chunk of orbiting ice at the same time.

b. Both men were within walking distance of one another, even though one was manning a Star Fleet outpost and the other had inexplicably taken up residence in a cave.

c. Out of all the places Kirk’s unpiloted capsule could have landed on this planet, it just happened to set down within walking distance of both men.

Ridiculous.

The same, stupid thing happened in The Empire Strikes Back. Luke Skywalker heads to Dagobah to meet Yoda and crash-lands on the planet, with no idea where Yoda might be. Thankfully, Luke discovers that he has miraculously landed about 35 feet from Yoda’s hovel, despite the enormous size of the planet.

Ridiculous.

A friend tried to explain the coincidence by declaring that this was the Force at work, but in Episode I, it is made clear that the power of the Force is derived from microscopic organisms living in symbiosis with other living beings, and therefore the Force would have no control over where an X-wing fighter might crash on a swamp-filled planet.

This unfortunate section of the movie closes with future-Spock’s view of Vulcan being destroyed from the surface of the frozen planet. But any junior astronomer could tell you that if a planet that appears about five times the size of our Moon in the daytime sky is destroyed, the shift in gravitation as a result of the disappearance of the planet would send all other planetary bodies, and especially ones as close as this frozen planet was, spinning off into space.

Yet Spock, Scotty, and the frozen planet all remain perfectly safe as Vulcan is eaten by a temporary black hole.

If only I could have sat down with the writers of this film and said, “Look guys. There’s no way that Kirk can be marooned on the same uninhabited planet as future Spock and Scotty. And there’s no way he finds them this easily, just about a stone’s throw from one another. Let’s spend thirty seconds of movie-time cleaning this up a bit. Okay?”

Please?

“And then let’s talk about how gravity works in space. Okay?”

So once again I put out the offer to any and all movie directors, writers and producers: Run your script by me. Give me an advanced screening of your film. Let me help you by clearing up the improbability and silliness that seems to plague so many films. A few minor corrections or a moment of explanation can change a movie from one that is flawed and silly to one that is memorable and right.

Mr. Spielberg. Are you listening?