The solution to all of my ponytail, pigtail, and braiding woes

Other than simple brushing, I can do nothing with my daughter’s hair. I can’t braid it. I can’t pin it back with a barrette. I can’t wrap it in a ponytail.

These pigtails might at well be the Mona Lisa to me. Impossible to comprehend. Impossible to reproduce.

image

For at least a year, I couldn’t even get all of the soap out of her hair when I bathed her. My wife had to return her to the bathtub on multiple occasions to finish the job.

Even worse, I can’t remove any of the elastics from her hair at the end of the day without causing pain and suffering.

I watch my wife do things with her hair in the same way I would watch a Harlem Globetrotter manipulate a basketball.

Then along comes this man, with a solution to all my problems, as long as my wife and my daughter are willing to go along with it.

Future Futurist. Actually, current futurist, looking for his first paycheck.

In the program for my most recent Moth GrandSLAM performance, my bio mentioned that I am a Lord of Sealand, which is true and garnered many comments from friends and audience members. It also mentioned that I am a teacher, writer, minister, life coach, professional public speaker, and wedding DJ.

I collect jobs.

In addition to those listed above, I’ve expressed interest in becoming a unaccredited sociologist, a stand-up comedian, a professional best man (five grooms and a reality show developer have tried to hire me for this position so far), a gravesite visitor, and a double date companion.

Today I find myself with a new career aspiration: Futurist.

A futurist is “a person who studies the future and makes predictions about it based on current trends.” Well known futurists in the United States include Ray Kurzweil, Alvin Toffler and Syd Mead.

image

image

I think I could do this. For a few reasons.

First, it doesn’t require accreditation of any kind.

Though the Association of Professional Futurists states that some futurists begin their careers by earning a graduate degree in futures studies, “many professionals become futurists by acquainting themselves with futures concepts, tools and methods, familiarizing themselves with the literature, apprenticing or collaborating with professional futurists, and participating in futures professional development, conferences, and organizations.”

I can do that. I can acquaint myself with future concepts and familiarize myself with literature. I could attend a futurist conference (if one was ever to come to town) and even join the Association of Professional Futurists if I wanted to spend the $150.

Second, and more importantly, no agency is currently responsible for keeping track of a futurist’s accuracy. A futurist could be batting well below the Mendoza line and no one would know it.

I have enough accountability in my life already. The idea of a profession which demands no accountability of any kind appeals to me greatly.

Best of all, I think I would be quite effective at predicting future trends, particularly because no one will be checking to see otherwise. 

With all this in mind, I officially declare myself a futurist. I’m adding it to my list of occupations. Squeezing it into my bio. Looking for someone who wants to hire me and turn this futurist into a professional futurist. 

Here are my first five predictions as a futurist:

  1. Physical books are far from dead. In the next decade, physical books will experience a resurgence as people seek a greater balance between the digital and the physical.

  2. Within ten years (and possibly sooner), the great majority of American politicians, both Republican and Democrat, will acknowledge the dangers of global warming and begin to act in concert to address this issue.

  3. The growing concerns over concussions and their long-term effects will do nothing to deter the continued growth of the National Football League into the foreseeable future.

  4. Movie studios will produce high quality, made-for-television movies within the next decade.

  5. Portable, highly accurate universal translators will eliminate the language barrier to communication.

Own your crazy

People are weird. People are crazy. People obsess over things, worry about things and develop rituals around things that baffle and confuse the people around them.

It’s okay. As long as you’re not hurting anyone, it’s really okay.

But here’s my advice:

Own your crazy.

Don’t deny it. Don’t defend it. Don’t attempt to mitigate it. Simply own it. Admit to it, acknowledge it, and people (I promise) will accept you.

It’s only when you attempt to defend your crazy as normal that people get annoyed, frustrated, and angry.

It’s only when you refuse to own your crazy that you risk being perceived as crazy.

I wear wireless headphones on my head. I wear them almost all the time. I have them on now. I wear them in my house, in the car, on the streets, and while walking the hallways at work. Whenever I am not speaking or listening to someone or writing, there is a book or a podcast or a song playing in my head.

This is not normal. It’s kind of crazy.

image

I think it allows me to consume vast quantities of content. I think it increases my productivity exponentially. I think it allows me to eliminate many of the petty annoyances of the world.

But a man walking through life wearing headphones almost all of the time is not normal. It’s kind of crazy. When I acknowledge that it’s kind of crazy, people nod. They smile. They even laugh. And that’s the end of it.

I own my crazy.

During the school year, I eat the exact same food for breakfast and lunch almost every day without variation. Egg McMuffin for breakfast. Oatmeal for lunch. Every day.

That is kind of crazy.

It reduces the amount of time I spend eating considerably. It eliminates  time spend making food choices or preparing other meals. And I like Egg McMuffins and oatmeal. The Egg McMuffin provides a good breakfast, and the oatmeal is an excellent means of keeping your cholesterol down.

But eating the same thing every single day is crazy. I know it. I own it.  

image image

See? That wasn’t hard.

My friend tells me that this advice is pointless because people are not self aware. He says that it’s rare for a person to possess actual introspection. He claims that it’s almost impossible for people to turn a critical eye upon themselves.

I hope he’s wrong.

So if you’re the parent of a five year-old daughter, and you have never left her with a babysitter because you fear for your child’s safety, that is completely understandable.

And a little crazy.

Rather than attempting to defend this position, simply say, “I really can’t leave my daughter with anyone except my sister at this point. I can’t even leave her with my best friend. I know. It’s a little crazy. It’s just the way I’m doing things right now.”

If your children spend more time sleeping in your bed than their own, that’s okay. I know many parents with this unfortunate arrangement. But it’s crazy. Just say it. “Yes, my three kids sleep in our bed a lot of the time, and I even have a cot at the end of the bed for one of them. Sometimes my husband has to sleep in the kids’ beds to get some sleep. It’s absolutely crazy, but I’m not ready to change things yet.”

Own it.

If the television is on in your house all day long, that’s kind of crazy.

If your preferred leisure activity is shopping, that’s kind of crazy.

If you mow your lawn three times a week, that’s kind of crazy.

If you can’t leave your six cats alone for more than three hours at a time, that’s kind of crazy.

If you wash and wax your car every other day, that’s kind of crazy.

If you don’t read, that’s kind of crazy.

If you refuse to ride in a car unless you’re the driver, that’s kind of crazy.

If you don’t want to split the check evenly because you had one less drink than your dinner companions, that’s kind of crazy.

Simply acknowledge that your actions are not normal, and people will be far more accepting and even sympathetic to your needs. They are more likely to accommodate you needs. They will be more understanding.

Deny your crazy and risk being perceived as legitimately crazy.

Own your crazy and you’ll be perceived as normal.

Just like the rest of us.

Opinions on parenting that differ from your own should not turn you into a raging lunatic.

I was asked about my philosophy of parenting yesterday.

I hesitated to answer for a moment. Even though I am asked about parenting advice quite often, nothing annoys people more than implying that there may be a preferred and ideal means of parenting that does not match their own.

The people who ask for my advice have never attacked me for expressing the idea that some forms of parenting may be more effective than others, but bystanders are often enraged by these conversations, and whenever I write about parenting advice, I often receive responses like:

“Only a fool would believe that he knows more about parenting than any other parent.”

“There is no right way to parent, jackass.”

“Every child is different, so parenting must be different for every child.”

“The only thing I know for sure about parenting is that you can’t know anything for sure.”

“What makes you an expert?”

In response to that last question, I explain that I am often asked for parenting advice because:

  1. I have been a teacher for 15 years. In addition to working closely with hundreds of children during that time, I have also been witness to the types of parenting styles and philosophies that repeatedly produce the most capable and effective students.
  2. I raised a stepdaughter from the ages of 5-17.
  3. I have two children of my own.

Does this make me an expert?

Probably not, though I’m not sure what would be required in order for me to be considered an expert.

Do I need to have more children?

Do I need to study the science of parenting at the graduate level?

Do I need to raise my two children to adulthood before I can be deemed an expert?

A rhetorically convenient response to my question would be, “When it comes to parenting, there are no experts. Only survivors.”

That sounds clever, but it’s also nonsense. Some people have more effective parenting strategies than others. Some people understand children better than others. Some people are capable of making more informed and reasoned parenting decisions than others.

image

So why do parents become so enraged when someone expresses opinions that do not match their own parenting methods? Or when someone believes that certain parenting strategies are universally more effective than others?

If you don’t agree with someone like me, just ignore my advice. Move on. Assign me to your mental list of idiots and morons and continue doing what you believe is right.

We do this everyday, for many different reasons. We discount experts as quacks. We ignore advice that sounds foolish. We turn our backs on blowhards who think they have all of the answers.

But when it comes to parenting, people often seem less capable of hearing or reading alternative viewpoints without becoming angry.

Why?

There is no need to bear your claws. There is no need for an angry, lip trembling verbal assault. I’m simply stating my opinion, forcefully.  

image

Yes, I think that some ways of parenting are universally more effective than others, regardless of the child.

Yes, I think that my experience as a father, a stepfather, and a teacher has given me some insight into parenting.

Yes, despite the inability of many to understand why, I am asked for advice quite often.

But even if my opinions on parenting are correct, that doesn’t mean that your parenting decisions are ineffective. It doesn’t make you a bad Mommy or Daddy. My differing opinion does not constitute an attack on your way of life or the future prospects of your children.

It’s just my opinion, probably solicited by another person.  

There’s no need to get upset.

So I answered that person’s question yesterday, providing advice similar but more nuanced to advice I gave someone on the golf course three years ago, which, of course, also caused people to feel like I was attacking their parenting decisions.

image

I’m not asking you to agree with my position or follow my advice. I’m merely asking that you try not to become enraged when someone presumes to know something about parenting and expresses an opinion different from your own.

There are a lot of idiots in the world. I may even be one of them.

The secret to happiness is based upon perspective and expectation.

Shaquille O’Neal, the former basketball superstar, NBA champion, actor, and the MBA- and PhD-holding business impresario, offers his secret to happiness:

My secret is waking up saying it could be worse. 85% of all athletes, three to five years after they’re playing, have nothing, no income, no nothing. I could be one of those guys.

image

I think similarly, though rather than comparing my success to others, I compare my current position in life to where I once was.

Looking back on where I began and the challenges that I have faced, I can’t help but be happy today.

The wife and kids help, too.  

But I also think that happiness is strongly dependent upon expectation.

If you don’t like to relax, you will never be disappointed.

If you don’t like a warm bath or a Jacuzzi or long afternoons sunning yourself on the beach, you’ll never be disappointed.

If you don’t like spending time in bed, you’ll never be disappointed.

But if you love to spend your like moving, playing, working, chasing and creating, you will always be happy.

How to Stop a Wedding: Much better advice than what Slate had to offer.

Slate recently published a piece advising readers on how to stop a wedding. The editors of Slate loved this piece, declaring it on Twitter to be one of the most popular articles ever amongst Slate staffers.  

The advice is decent, albeit a little obvious.

  • “Think about why you want to break up the wedding.”
  • “Approach the bride or groom several days or weeks before the wedding.”
  • “Organize your thoughts.”
  • “Be graceful.”

I don’t exactly think “Be graceful” is the kind of advice that people are looking for when trying to stop a wedding.

Not exactly helpful.

And what were the alternatives to this advice?

Don’t give any consideration to the reasons for wanting to break up the wedding. Just g with your gut. Enter the conversation as mentally disorganized as possible. Wait until about 15 minutes before the ceremony and be as rude as possible.

See what I mean? I hardly think that the advice that Slate is offering is groundbreaking.

image 

In my life, I have attempted to stop two weddings. Both times, I used the same strategy, and and both times, my attempts failed. This may make you wonder why I am qualified to offer advice on this topic.

Perhaps I am not.

But two things:

  1. Slate makes no claims that the author of this piece was ever successful either, so I am at least as qualified as the author of this piece (which is actually a collection of anonymous WikiHow contributors).
  2. Despite my attempts to stop the weddings, I remained close friends with both brides. After each subsequent divorce (I was at least correct in my prediction about the future of these marriages), both brides acknowledged my attempt to save them from disaster and thanked me.

I didn’t stop the wedding, but my attempts did not damage my friendships with these women.

Slate also offers advice on how to stop a wedding in process. I think this is  stupid. If you haven’t tried to stop the wedding by the time the actual ceremony begins, then you need to keep your mouth shut. There are too many other people invested in a wedding day for you to ruin it by your inability to speak up beforehand. And in the event that you are wrong and the marriage lasts (which is entirely possible), you will have placed an irreparable black mark on the couple’s special day. 

Divorce is a simple process these days, especially when there are no kids in the equation. Wait a month or two and then check in on the party in question. Inquire about the status of the marriage. Ascertain your friend’s level of happiness. Attempt to break it up then if necessary.

In both of my cases, the person who I was encouraging to stop the wedding was also a woman who I had once dated. In one case, this had amounted to a single date. In the other, we dated exclusively for about four months. I remained friends with both women after our romantic relationship ended. I attempted to stop these weddings because their future husbands were not good men. I had no interest in resuming a romantic relationship with either woman.

There were no ulterior motives.

My advice to stopping a wedding is simple:

If your intention is to stop a wedding in order to win someone back or win someone over, don’t. If the person in question is happy in his or her relationship, you have no right to open your mouth. Every day, men and women get married, and every day, there are those who wish that they were standing beside the bride or groom instead. Love is not always reciprocal. In fact, it’s rarely reciprocal.

Deal with it.

If you are attempting to stop the wedding because you believe that the marriage is doomed, either because it’s a bad match, or the person in question is settling, or the future spouse is not a good person, then proceed with the following steps: 

  1. Check with one or more of the person’s closest friends before proceeding. Do not attempt to stop a wedding without obtaining agreement from at least one other knowledgeable, unbiased person. We all make mistakes. This is not the moment to be wrong.
  2. Meet the person alone. Even if the person’s six closest friends agree that the wedding should be stopped, no one likes to be ambushed. No one likes to be outnumbered. Enter the conversation solo. Better to allow the friends and family in agreement to be waiting in the wings, ready to affirm your opinion once the person has been given time to process your words.
  3. Choose a setting that allows you to leave immediately if necessary and permits the betrothed the privacy that he or she may require. This is not the time to meet your friend for dinner at a restaurant. You need to be able to dispense with your advice and exit if that is what the person desires. This will not be an easy conversation. Be prepared to eject.   
  4. Be direct. Explain in clear and uncertain terms why the wedding should be stopped. Be sure to have specific examples to support your concerns.
  5. Tell the person that you are not the only one who thinks this way. Offer names of others in agreement. Encourage the person to seek out their counsel as well.
  6. Offer to assist in the cessation of the wedding. Explain that you are willing to do whatever is necessary to make it possible. You will call caterers. Meet with photographers. Negotiate the return of deposits. Even stand by his or her side when the news is broken to the fiancée. 
  7. Assure the person that people call off weddings all the time. If you have a specific example of a mutual friend who did so, use it. Suggest that he or she consult with this person.
  8. Be prepared for significant turmoil in your friendship, including the possible end of your friendship. This could happen. As I’ve said many times, the easy thing and the right thing are rarely the same thing.

Last month, my wife and I ran into one of the women whose marriage has ended. She told us how happy she was that her divorce was nearly finalized. It was the first time that I had seen her since the dissolution of her marriage, so I couldn’t help myself.

“You know,” I said. “I told you not to marry that guy.”

My wife punched me in the arm (as she is wont to do) and told me that I was a jerk for saying something like that.

“No,” the woman said. “Matt was right. He told me not to marry [that guy], so he has a right to say ‘I told you so.’ No one else warned me like he did.”

It’s true that I didn’t stop the wedding. My advice failed to yield the desired results. But stopping a wedding is hard. Telling someone not to marry the person who he or she loves is hard.

My record is 0-2, but I stand by my advice.

It’s at least a hell of a lot better than what Slate had to offer.

Why do I remember my childhood with such clarity when so many others do not?

My wife says I have an excellent memory. I’ve never thought so, but it’s true that I can lock a story into my mind and manipulate it onstage without much difficulty.

That said, my visual memory is almost nonexistent. My wife also says that if she were placed in a lineup with five other brunettes, I would be hard pressed to pick her out of the group.

An exaggeration, of course, but not far from the truth.

She also says that I remember my childhood in a way that few others do. My sister is the same way, if not more so. I’ve often wondered why people seem to remember so little from their childhood while I seem to remember so much.

I recently came up with a theory.

image

I grew up in a world that was often entirely absent of adults. My siblings and I were left on our own for large swaths of time. At an early age, I would leave the house at an early hour and often not return until dinnertime. I would babysit my brothers and sisters into the wee hours of the morning. We were given responsibilities and freedoms as children that would result in endless strings of DCF calls today.

Our parents didn’t engage in long discussions with us, and we were often in the dark about many things. There was no mention of the birds and the bees. There was no talk about our future. There were entire school years when my report cards went unread. There was a great division between child and adult in our home, and rarely was this division breached. This led to many challenges, much turmoil, and a constant need for problem solving and improvisation on my part.

In short, the way that I was raised (or not raised) led to many unique experiences and trouble.

My wife, by contrast, spent vast amounts of time with her parents. They drove to the Berkshires every weekend. Visited family often. Spent time together at the beach near their Berkshire home. Established traditions and routines that remain to this day.

My wife had a childhood of consistency, nurturing, and adult supervision. It was the kind of childhood that I hope for my children. 

Perhaps my wife remembers less about her childhood because it was so consistent. So measured. So safe. Each day and each year resembled the next in a way that mine never did.

This is not to say that she led a boring or uneventful childhood. It was simply more predictable and tradition-based. She remembers much of her childhood through a gauzy shade of warmth and happiness. She recalls fewer specifics but has much more affection for the way that she was raised.

If you don’t spend your childhood lost in the woods, exploring the basements of burned-out farm houses, swimming unsupervised in cow ponds and stranger’s swimming pools, riding your bike for miles and miles from home, trespassing on construction sites, fighting, and living in a perpetual state of trouble and endless struggle, you are probably less likely to have the kinds of singular experiences that are piled high in my mind.

Perhaps I remember my childhood better than others because every day of my childhood was a new adventure. This is not to say that these adventures were welcomed or advised or even fun.

But they were certainly memorable. 

Two conditions are required for justified embarrassment. If these conditions are not present, move on with your life.

Moomin Café in Tokyo has gained notoriety in recent weeks for their offer to seat gigantic stuffed animals across the table from solo diners in an attempt to reduce any discomfort from eating alone.

image

Naturally, this would make any rationale person infinitely more uncomfortable.

Slate recently ran a piece entitled What It Is Like To Eat Alone at a Fancy Restaurant that opens with this sentence:

I hated eating alone. I've gone out of my way to avoid eating alone, because it makes me feel awkward and extremely self-aware.

I realize that this may sound naïve, but I fail to understand any discomfort that people feel with eating alone in any restaurant.

Embarrassment is a real emotion, and I certainly experience it on occasion.

The time when a student pointed out the enormous hole that my cat had chewed in the front of my woolen pants was embarrassing.

The time when I mistakenly called a person who I know well by the wrong name three times in the span of 30 minutes was embarrassing.

The time when I drove in the wrong direction on Fifth Avenue in front of the Metropolitan Museum of Art and had be assisted in a three-point turn by my grandmother-in-law’s doorman in the presence of my wife was embarrassing.  

But dining alone? This hardly seems embarrassing at all. This isn’t exactly high school. People aren’t sitting alone at a cafeteria table because their classmates have ostracized them.

Sometimes we find ourselves alone and in need of a meal. This does not indicate a failure of action or character. It’s reasonable for people to occasionally be alone at mealtime.

Moreover, I fail to understand embarrassment when it happens in front of people who we will never see again or when it happens absent an act of stupidity or thoughtlessness.

If you’re never going to see these people in the restaurant again, who cares?

If you haven’t done something incredibly stupid or thoughtless, who cares?

Even if the waiter and your fellow diners are laughing at you (and they are not because people are not nearly as interested in you as you think), you will never see these people again.

You’ve done nothing wrong.

Why feel embarrassment?

If you say something incredibly rude and your dinner companion throws a glass of water in your face and storms out of the restaurant, leaving you alone at the table, I would understand feeling embarrassed.

If you declined a dinner invitation with an annoying friend and was then spotted by that same friend eating alone, I’d understand feeling embarrassed.

But if you’re worried about what the middle-aged couple sitting to your left or the group of twenty-somethings sitting to your right are thinking about your decision to dine alone, you probably have a lot of room for personal growth.

A cashier recently commented on the wireless headphones that practically live on top of my head. She said, “I love the idea of those things, but I think I’d feel a little weird walking around with them. Don’t you worry what people think about them?”

“People?” I said. “No. Why would I care what you think about me? My wife and friends? Maybe.”

But in the case of my headphones, I still don’t care. Yes, they make me look different than almost everyone else around me, and yes, they even look a little silly at times. And it’s true that I get questions about them all the time, including comments like those of the cashier.

People question me about them all the time. 

But my wife sees the value to wearing them, and she blessedly accepts me for who I am (perhaps because she also tends not to care about what others think). It’s true that some of my friends and family have teased me about my headphones, but who cares? They’re not exactly rescinding their friendship in the process.

A few have made passive-aggressive comments about my decision to wear my headphones, but making a passive-aggressive comment is much more egregious and potentially embarrassing than wearing a pair of headphones for much of the day.

One or two people have actually approached my wife, questioning my decision to wear my headphones as often as I do, but she rightfully dismissed these comments by asking these individuals to file their complaint with me instead of her.

Despite what some may think, she’s not my mother.

I feel embarrassed when I do something stupid or thoughtless in the presence of people who I care about and respect.

I feel like this is the appropriate bar for embarrassment. Absent these two conditions, I rarely feel embarrassed. 

None of these conditions apply to dining solo. If you’re feeling embarrassed about eating alone in a restaurant, reject the stuffed animal, order the prime rib, and get over it.

It’s likely that the only person in the restaurant who is even aware of your solitary status is you.

A simple solution to the lemon and lime shortage that will improve your life at the same time

Perhaps you’ve heard that there is a shortage of lemons and limes in the US.

The average U.S. grocery store now commands 53 cents per lime, up from 21 cents this time last year. The problem originates in Mexico, which now exports more than 90 percent of American’s limes.

May I offer a solution?

Stop demanding that wedges of lemons and lime be placed on your glass of soda at restaurants.

image

There was a time, not too long ago, when the vast majority of sodas in the world were served  without a citrus garnish, and everyone was perfectly happy with their beverage.

Then one day, for reasons probably lost to antiquity, servers began delivering sodas with lemons and limes hanging off the edge of the glass, and suddenly it became a requirement.

For the vast majority of Americans, lemons and limes aren’t exactly locally grown, so eliminating them from your beverage will not only help in solving the lemon and lime shortage, but it will be helpful to the environment, too.

And let’s face it:

It’s a little pretentious to require a lemon wedge on the edge of your glass every time you drink a Coke. 

Why not just go back to a simpler time when lemon and lime garnishments were not an expectation?

Simplicity and minimalism are truly beautiful things.

The double standard of sexist statements

Ruth Reichl, former editor of Gourmet magazine, was interviewed on the Harvard Business Review’s podcast this week.

image

In the course of 14 minutes, she said:

  1. “Women leaders are more practical than men.”
  2. Women are more sensitive than men to the struggles of balancing home and work responsibilities.
  3. Though she was told that she would likely have to “clean house” when she took over the magazine, she ended up firing just one person. She attributed this ability to retain staff and avoid employee turnover to “possibly being a woman.”
  4. When female employees announced that they were pregnant and intended on returning to work following the birth of their children, she would tell them, “Now you’re going to understand what guilt is.”

I have no issue with Reichl’s assertions.

I don’t necessarily agree with them, and I find her statement to pregnant employees to be stupid, presumptuous and insensitive, but she is expressing an opinion based on her anecdotal experience. She believes these things, as wrongheaded as they may be, and she has a right to her opinion. 

My issue is this:

Imagine if a man has made similar statements.

Imagine if a man in Reichl’s position has said that men were more practical than women.

Imagine if a man had attributed his ability to retain staff to his something inherent in his gender.

Imagine if a man had declared that men have a keener understanding of the challenges of balancing work life and home life.

Imagine if a male boss made it a habit of telling pregnant employees that they will finally understand what guilt is.

A man would have an equal right to his opinion, but I suspect that his opinions would not be allowed to go as unchallenged as Reichl’s were.

I can’t help but think that a man would be punished in the court of public opinion for making statements like these, whereas Reichl’s statements are entirely ignored by her Harvard Business Review’s interviewer in favor of her next question.

What is fine for Reichl to say would likely be politically incorrect and possibly damaging to the career of a man in her same position.

I don’t think Reichl should be punished for her opinions. I would like to see them questioned by an interviewer who does not simply sit back and allow her subject to make numerous gender-based assumptions, but I don’t think that people should avoid purchasing Reichl’s new novel based upon her statements.

Reichl believes these things to be true. An interviewer's job is to test these beliefs. Demand that their subject support these assertions with facts.

And more importantly, not punish a man for making similar gender-based assumptions in the future. 

New rule: NO MORE WEATHER TALK

I have a new policy, which I enacted (somewhat awkwardly) for the first time yesterday:

Whenever the topic of conversation turns to the weather, and it doesn’t include a tornado, hurricane, major snow event, or similar weather anomaly, I leave the room if at all possible.

We all have the current weather conditions and the weekly forecast for anywhere in the world on our phones. We have maps with Doppler radar imaging that allow us to track storm systems with the accuracy of a meteorologist.

We don’t need to talk about the weather anymore.

image

I’d rather converse with a mean-spirited, overly aggressive New York Jets fan than someone who is tedious, and nothing strikes me as more tedious than a needless conversation about the weather.

No makeup is a thing now. Turns out that I was merely ahead of the curve.

Fewer things draw more ire from my readers than when I write about my wish that makeup would become a thing of the past.

It never goes well.

Even my desire for Olympic athletes to stop wearing makeup while competing drew an angry protest.

In fairness to myself, I receive quite a bit of support for my position as well, and primarily by women, but those that disagree with my position really disagree. 

Rather than producing any original content today (and suffering a backlash), I’ll merely quote from two studies on recent trends in makeup that warm my heart.

  • A survey conducted in August of last year found that most women between the ages of 18 and 25—67 percent—use fewer than three products in their hair and beauty routines. Only 20 percent use four to seven products, and a tiny 3 percent use more than 12.
  • The call of fresh-facedness is even stronger for women over 25, 72 percent of whom limit their makeup use to zero to three products.
  • Brides in rapidly increasing numbers are choosing to go makeup-free on their wedding day, and when they do wear makeup, the overwhelming trend is for an extremely minimal approach.
  • The hashtag #nomakeupselfies is one of the fastest growing on Twitter and Instagram, with celebrities like Beyoncé, Gwyneth Paltrow and Cameron Diaz posting photos of themselves without makeup.

 image

Don’t even try to invade North Hampton

If you plan on invading a small, New England town anytime soon (and who isn’t?), I suggest that you avoid targeting North Hampton, Massachusetts.

I was in North Hampton recently for a performance with The Moth. In the center of town, at the top of a hill, is City Hall, complete with crenelated towers and arrow slits.

image

Lest you think this was originally a fort of some kind, think again.

From North Hampton’s historical society:

Northampton's City Hall, built in 1850, has survived despite numerous assaults on its very existence. William Fenno Pratt, who designed many buildings on Main Street, conceived of it as a novelty. It combines elements of the then new revival styles of Gothic, Tudor and the trademark Norman towers replete with arrow slits. Being a novelty it was bound to attract both ardent admirers as well as detractors. One of the most powerful detractors was Mayor Harry E. Bicknell, who dubbed it a building with "flip-flops and flop-doodles." He, along with many others in 1923, wanted it torn down and replaced. Although aesthetic debate raged it was the fiscally conservative voters of Northampton who saved the building, opting to remodel it in order to save money.

“Flip-flops and flop-doodles."

Old Mayor Bicknell certainly had a way with words.

Casual Friday EVERYDAY could save the world (and your soul)

I have argued for years that formal dress codes and formal dress expectations are ridiculous.

The idea that men go to work every day in a coat and tie, even when it’s 85 degrees outside, is insane.

Neckties are insane in all circumstances. Wrapping your neck in an unnecessary floral noose is insane.

I stopped wearing ties about six years ago. Other than my sister-in-law’s wedding and two weddings that I officiated, I have not worn a tie in that time. I only wear a suit if I am attending a wedding or another formal situation (an interview, for example) where my lack of a suit might impede my success.

Even then, failing to comport to the expected dress code is often irrelevant and unnoticed, as I have argued here before.

If you are a person who thinks that formal dress is ridiculous but worries about the impression that you may be making, I have hope for you:

The United Nations panel on climate change, along with researchers at Lancaster University, are recommending that we abandon the stupidity of a suit and tie in an effort to curb climate change.

That’s right. Stop dressing like a mindless automaton who the sixteen year-old version of you would have despised and you can do your part to save the world.  

Currently, heating and cooling systems in the office and at home are designed to provide comfortable conditions for people wearing lightweight clothing, such as suits.

As more people wear casual, thicker clothing, these buildings will need less energy.

‘There is no doubt that the move away from formal office wear towards jeans, hoodies and more casual clothes is reducing the need for workplaces to be heated to the same degree,’ said Professor Elizabeth Shove from the research center.

‘And in hot climates, why not change dress codes rather than cooling buildings to counter the effect of wearing a suit and tie? These are not entirely fanciful questions.’

Not fanciful at all.

image

How many times have you seen this happen:

A man and a woman arrive at a formal affair. The man is wearing a suit and tie, which amounts to more clothing than he ever wears in his regular life. As a result, he is warm and uncomfortable. If there is dancing at this affair, he will likely perspire as much as he would while working out at the gym.

At the same time, his female companion is wearing a little black dress. Because the room is being cooled for the men in their formal attire, the woman is cold. Her arms are covered with goose bumps. As a result, she eventually dons the suit coat of her male counterpart.

By the way, if dancing is involved, she is likely wearing shoes that will need to be removed in order to dance.

As a wedding DJ, I watch this bizarre ritual all the time. Men and women dress in ways that deny themselves comfort.

It turns out that not only is it stupid, but it’s hurting our planet.

Around half the energy used in buildings is used to keep them at this temperature, all over the world, regardless of the weather outside.

If we all decided to dress for comfort rather than some arcane sense of what is proper or appropriate, we could make an enormous dent in CO2 transmissions.

We could also be more like the people we wanted to be when we were young and idealistic and brave.

You’re not in trouble if the only consequence is a verbal reminder.

Trouble is a matter of perspective.

When a colleague, for example, tells me that he or she “got in a lot of trouble” for failing to complete a task or adhere to a policy, it almost always means that the principal has spoke to the person and warned him or her against committing the offense again.

I do not think of this as trouble. I think of this as being spoken to by your boss. I think of it as a requested change in behavior or performance.

Early in my career, when I was less subtle and considerably less wise, I would point this out to my colleagues, failing to acknowledge (or even realize) that many of these teachers are former students who graduated from high school and college with 4.0 GPAs and a list of extra-curriculum activities a mile long.

I would venture to guess that many of my colleagues never failed to hand in a homework assignment on time.

Teachers tend to be some of the best students in their classes. The ones who behaved well and always wanted to do well. The ones who loved school.

In this regard, being called into the principal’s office for a verbal reminder might be be considered trouble.

They’ve never been suspended from school. Caught selling term papers to fellow classmates. Been assigned in-school suspensions for damaging school property. Pulled fire alarms for cash. Set records for the most consecutive detentions ever. 

They’ve never received a report card with an F or even a D. Never been arrested by the police. Never had the police break up a party in their apartment. They’ve never been tried in a court of law. Fired from a job or had their career threatened in any meaningful way.

image

In a recent, completely unscientific survey, most of them have even received a speeding ticket.

When you come from a background like mine, a verbal reminder does not constitute trouble. It’s just a reminder about what you’re supposed to be doing. A recommended change in behavior. A correction in performance.  

For me, trouble is trouble. It is a behavior with an associated and meaningful consequence that will negatively impact my immediate or long-term future in a real, tangible way.

Over the years, I’ve seen this variation in perspective in my students, too. For some, a meeting with the principal about behavior is just another meeting with the principal. Five minutes later, they are behaving as if the meeting never happened.

For others, a reminder from me to pay attention in class can cause visible signs of distress for an hour or more.

Perspective is everything.

That said, even with a pristine record and lifetime of exemplary job performance, I still have a hard time accepting the idea that your boss’s expression of disapproval or request for a change in performance constitutes trouble.

If there is no tangible consequence, it’s not trouble.

But I’m smart enough today to keep these opinions to myself.

Things You Should Do Everyday to Improve Your Life For Real: Give everyone the benefit of the doubt.

I don’t like TIME’s list of 10 Things You Should Do Everyday to Improve Your Life For Real.

First of all, I never trust a list with ten items. A round number like ten leads me to think that an item or two was added or removed in order to achieve the seemingly perfect ten. 

More importantly, the items on TIME’s list are all fairly obvious, making the list relatively useless.

Exercise.
Spend time with friends and family.
Laugh.
Challenge yourself.
Express gratitude.

This is not a helpful list. These are things that you are either doing already or already know that you should be doing.

In response, I intend to offer my own list of things that you should do everyday to improve your life for real. Rather than offering the list all at once, I will post my ideas at random intervals on this blog. They will represent lessons that I have learned over the years that have improved my life. My goal is to present items not nearly as obvious or universally known as “Meditate” (something I do) or “Get out into nature.”

Today’s idea:

Always give everyone the benefit of the doubt.

On an almost everyday basis, I encounter people who make enormous assumptions about the actions and motivations of others. More often than not, these people assume the worst of people, and this often leads to confrontation, behind-the-back conversation, embarrassment and a persistent, pervasive level of distrust and deceit.

I try to remember that everyone is the hero of their story, and in most cases, people make decisions that they believe are right and just. Rather than assuming the worst, I give people the benefit of the doubt and try to assume the best. I try to understand how and why a person might rationalize their decision in the context of doing the right or fair thing.

I find myself in the position of Devil’s Advocate quite often.

I also find myself frequently complaining to friends and colleagues that they have forced me into defending a person who I would rather not defend simply because they are jumping to conclusions and assuming the worst. Why not allow the person in question to prove or disprove their good intent rather than assuming it for them? 

Case in point:

A friend recently read a comment on her son’s report card and assumed that the teacher was attributing her son’s struggles to a failure in the home. I explained to this friend that the comment could interpreted several ways, and since it was her son’s teacher, why not assume the best of intentions until proved otherwise? Instead, this friend entered the parent-teacher conference angry and combative, only to find herself apologizing for assuming the worst. 

image

When you give people the benefit of the doubt, good things happen.

1. You may be proven right. Wouldn’t that be great?

2. You’ll never be in a position of having to apologize or make excuses for your false assumptions. Even worse, people who assume the worst and are proven wrong often avoid responsibility for their faulty, inimical assumptions by pointing out that they are based upon a person’s previous history. This is simply a mealy-mouthed means of demonstrating their inability to take responsibility for their own actions.

3. You will constantly be placing yourself in the shoes of others, trying to understand their motivations better. You will find yourself seeking nobility rather than villainy. The ability to parse out all the possible motives of another person is a useful skill that will serve you well in life.

4,. When you give people the benefit of the doubt, others trust you more. They come to believe that you have people’s best interests at heart. You will be viewed as a more optimistic, trustworthy person. You will have more friends,    

5. Giving people the benefit of the doubt casts the world in a kinder, gentler light. It becomes a nicer place to live.

Parenting does not suck. It’s just that some people suck at life.

Slate’s Ruth Graham recently wrote a piece entitled “My Life is a Walking Nightmare.” Why Do Parents Make Parenting Sound So God-Awful?

Graham does not have children but experiences the constant stream of whiny negativity from her parent friends on a daily basis.

My Facebook feed is an endless stream of blog posts and status updates depicting the messy, tedious, nightmarishly life-destroying aspects of parenting. I’ve gawked at “15 Unbelievable Messes Made by Kids,” “All the Birth Control You’ve Ever Needed in Six Pictures of Ponytails” (which appeared on a blog called Rage Against the Minivan), and this uterus-shriveling poston how “You will not get anything done when you are home with a baby.” There’s this one on how you’ll give up on your values, your body, your style, and your hygiene after you have kids. There’s that British comedian’s stand-up routine, which has been viewed more than 4,700,000 times on YouTube, about how even leaving the house is a miserable odyssey of screaming and fighting.

I’ve never understood these people. I’ve always found the incessant whining and persistent warnings about parenthood to be a sign of a person who sucks at life and wants others to feel the same.

Or perhaps the sign of a pie-in-the-sky parents who thought babies came straight out of the womb potty trained and ready for kindergarten.

Or maybe parents whose upper middle class lives have been so free of strife or turmoil that even a stuffed puppy could’ve upset the apple cart for them.

Either way, I encourage the childless like Ruth Graham and the expectant parents to ignore these whiners and complainers.

Even better, tell them to shut up. Tell them to go whine to a wall. Tell them to go home and never leave the house again. There’s no need to ruin a pregnant mother’s day with your inability to find happiness in the company of your child.

A couple years ago, I wrote a piece entitled “Raising my daughter is a piece of cake, and there’s a good reason why I say this as often as possible” in response to this negativity. Our daughter was three years-old and my wife was pregnant with our second child. Two years later, everything that I wrote is still true, despite such witticisms as “One plus one doesn’t equal two when it comes to kids!”

Last year I wrote a piece entitled My children absolutely adore each other. If you feel the need to tell me it won’t last forever, shut the hell up. It was in response to the idiots who saw photos of my children playing together and said things like “You just wait. Things will change between the two of them,” and “Just wait until he can walk and talk. Then all that love will be out the window.”

Imagine how much you must hate yourself to say something like that to a proud father.

If you’re like Ruth Graham and hearing this kind of nonsense or reading it on social media, turn away. Read my posts instead.

Believe them. Embrace them.

Parenting is not easy. It’s glorious.

image image

My brand new, completely unrealistic, possibly supercilious goal that you should try, too.

I saw a middle-aged man yesterday wearing a pink shirt that didn’t quite cover his belly, a pair of yellow shorts, work boots without laces and no socks. I turned to comment on his appearance to my wife, but then I stopped myself.

We have no right or reason to think less of a person because of their physical appearance.

We have no right or reason to speak poorly of a person because of their physical appearance.

A person should be able to wear whatever he or she wants without ever having to suffer a negative word about it from anyone, to their face or behind their back.

Ever.

I have a policy to never comment on the physical appearance of a student, and I have managed to adhere to this rule for a long, long time. I’d like to think that I could apply a similar rule in the rest of my life. While I have no reason to avoid complimenting adults on their physical appearance, I’d like to think that I could refrain from negative comments of any kind at all times.

I know this is unrealistic. Even if I can ignore a person’s odd combination of clothing (and I usually can), there are so many other aspects of a person’s physical appearance that might illicit a negative comment.

Unusual haircuts. Numerous tattoos. Excessive plastic surgery. Gaudy jewelry. Ostentatious displays of designer labels. Bizarre piercings. Overdone makeup. Stupid little alligators embroidered over the right breast.

The list is endless.

Still, I’ve decided that I’m going to try. This is my goal.

It may seem ridiculous, supercilious, unnecessary or even stupid, but I also think it’s the right thing to do, and the right thing trumps ridiculous, supercilious, unnecessary, stupid, and everything else, every time.

I certainly don’t expect to be able to stop thinking these ugly thoughts about the physical appearance of others. I will try my best, but I’m not capable of miracles.

But we are all capable of keeping our mouths shut when one of those ugly thoughts enters our minds, as I managed to do yesterday.

This is my goal. When one of those ugly thoughts about a person’s physical appearance enters my mind, I will keep my mouth shut.

It won’t be easy, but as I’ve said before, the easy thing and the right thing are rarely the same thing.

image