Is your marriage destined for success? Rate you and your spouse using these indicators.

Researchers from Rice University and the University of Nebraska—Lincoln analyzed data collected from more than 5,000 couples in order to find out how similar political beliefs were among spouses, and how much these elements played a role in the success or failure of a couple.

Simply put, opposites don’t attract. Couples with more similarities tend to fair much better than those that don’t. 

Researchers found that spouses’ strongest similarities were in church attendance and political attitudes, outweighing personality and physical appearance, and that these were key indicators of a successful marriage.  

As a reluctant atheist, I have always felt that I married into the perfect religion, since (as a Jewish friend once said) Jews are just agnostics with complex backstories.

This isn’t far from the truth when it comes to my wife.

The study, published in the Journal of Politics, lists traits they found similar in spouses, from super-alike to somewhat-alike.

image

I went through the list to determine how Elysha and I rated, and we did well. It appears that we are destined for marital bliss. Here are the results:

  • Church attendance: Alike   
  • Political attitudes: Super alike    
  • Drinking frequency: Alike
  • Education: Super alike  
  • Height: Alike
  • Smoking frequency: Super alike
  • Weight: Alike
  • Sleep length: Not alike 

     

    Here is a selection of specific issues and attitudes that couples had similar views on, again rated from super-alike to less super-alike:

  • School prayer: Super alike 
  • Abortion: Alike
  • Gay rights: Super alike
  • X-rated movies: Huh? 
  • Death penalty: Super alike 
  • Divorce: Super alike 
  • Women's liberation: Alike   
  • Nuclear power: Not alike  
  • Astrology: Super alike 
  • Willingness to take a dangerous drug: Super alike 
  • Modern art: Alike 
  • Censorship: Super alike 
  • Belief that it's better to follow the rules: Not alike 
  • Liking to intimidate other people: Not alike 
  • Having been "fresh" to their parents as a child: Not alike
  • Best hurricane naming system ever

    I love this idea. It’s brilliant. It’s hilarious. It may not change minds, but it might shame and embarrass the criminally stupid and make the rest of us laugh in the process.

    Sadly, radical ideas like this rarely see the light of day. 

    Woman are cold

    My friend, who happens to be a physicist (so you know he’s smart) believes that women have a four degree comfort zone and men have a 20 degree comfort zone, and this explains why women are so often cold in an air conditioned environment. 

    I agree with this hypothesis. I have expanded slightly on his theory by identifying the average temperature ranges for both men and women.

    In my experience, women seem to be most comfortable in a 68-72 degree environment, whereas men seem just fine in temperatures ranging from 60-80 degrees.   

    I have not conducted a formal study to determine if my friend’s theory is correct, but I know this:

    In my four decades on this planet, I have never heard a man express the need for a sweater, jacket or wrap upon entering an air conditioned space. but I have heard a hundred thousand million women express this exact sentiment. 

    image

    This has been enough evidence for me, but lo and behold, there is actually some research that supports this belief. Findings suggest that there is a significant difference in heat perception between men and women on average. While studies have found that women's actual core body heat is slightly higher than men's, women's extremities tend to be a lot colder.

    In 1998, researchers at the University of Utah added a layer of subtlety to science's understanding of gender and body temperature. As had been found in previous studies, the researchers observed women tended to possess higher core temperatures than men (97.8 °F vs. 97.4 °F). Their hands, however, were consistently colder. A lot colder. While men registered an average hand temperature of 90 °F, the mean hand temperature for women was just 87.2 °F.

    Similar studies have also found this to be true for women’s feet as well. Apparently this reduced temperature in a woman’s extremities accounts for greater sensitivity to changes in air temperature.

    Thus the constant need for a sweater.

    What will forever remain a mystery to me is how often a woman finds herself in need of a sweater and doesn’t have one. If you’ve spent your entire life shivering in movie theaters, restaurants and banquet halls, why would you ever leave the house without an additional layer?

    I suspect that I’ll find no answer to this eternal conundrum.

    Jack’s magic beans have a better chance of working than this.

    I live in a perpetual state of existential crisis. Though I may have been born this way, I suspect that two near-death experiences and an armed robbery that left me with a decade long bout with PTSD contributed to my near-constant thoughts about mortality.

    My children don’t help with this problem. Watching them grow up is a ceaseless reminder of aging process.

    New research suggests that acetaminophen, the main ingredient in Tylenol, may be able to alleviate the pain of an existential crisis in the same way it alleviates the pain of a pounding headache.

    A pill to overcome the constant, omnipresent, soul crushing awareness that I might someday cease to exist?

    I don’t think so.

    tylenol

    Snooze button sucks

    I have always been anti-snooze button.

    There is no better way to waste time than to remain in bed after you have awoken. People waste hundreds, if not thousands of hours, a year doing this. If you’re going to be awake, you might as well start your day.

    The snooze button is a contributor to this problem, and according to science, you should not be using it. Ever.  

    A weaponized TV capable of melting metal

    Having just completed my annual science fair with my students, I find myself incredibly relieved that none of them discovered this video when deciding upon projects.

    This guy (who thankfully seems intelligent, reasonable and safe) has managed to create a laser from the parts of an old television and the power of the sun.

    The man essentially melts metal and sets fire to concrete with nothing more than a television screen and the sun.

    Not something I’d want my students to ever attempt, but just the kind of thing that you might want in the event of an apocalypse.

    No two snowflakes (or cows) are alike is bunk

    I read this week that all cows have different patterns of spots and “not a single cow has identical spots to another.”

    I’ve also been repeatedly told that no two snowflakes are ever alike.

    How can anyone say this with certainty?

    Do you have any idea how many cows are alive on the Earth at this moment?

    The International Erosion Control Association, which tracks overgrazing, estimated the number at 1.53 billion in 2001.

    With more than a billions cows alive on this planet at any one time, am I expected to believe that the chances of two cows having identical patterns of spots is zero?

    If we factor in all the cows that have ever lived, the statement becomes absurd.

    image image

    But the snowflake argument is even worse. It has snowed on this planet for billions of years. Trillions of snowstorms producing an average of 5.2 quintillion snowflakes each time.

    And I really expected to believe that no two snowflakes have ever been alike in all that time?

    Let’s put an end to the snowflake madness. Please?

    image image

    Science supports my wife’s hatred of cilantro and my hatred of broccoli, but she has more credibility than me in food related issues. Unfairly so.

    In speaking about cilantro, Julia Child once said, “I would pick it out if I saw it and throw it on the floor.”

    My wife concurs. Though her palate is wide and varied, cilantro is her most despised food item. 

    Apparently there might be good reason for this, at least according to research described in the New York Times.

    How convenient for my wife and Ms. Childs.

    image

    Of course, when I cite research indicating that broccoli is likely toxic to my system, people role their eyes and ignore my claims. It turns out that the larger your palate, the more credibility you have when citing a scientific reason for not liking a food.

    image

    I’m allergic to mustard, for example but it wasn’t until I accidentally ate a cheeseburger with mustard on it and experienced an actual allergic reaction that some of my friends accepted my allergy as real.

    Jerks.

    Just because I am a supertaster (verified by a test) with a somewhat limited palate doesn’t mean that broccoli’s toxicity might not apply to me.

    So stop rolling your goddamn eyes every time I mention this.

    The rebels haven’t gone anywhere. They just suck now.

    I tend to be a person who resists conformity and rejects tradition in favor of personal preference and a desperate attempt to preserve individuality and perhaps even enhance it.

    In reflecting upon the recent revisions of our rock opera, The Clowns, I came to realize that I have been crafting the play around an issue that is at the core of my being, and one closely aligned to my resistance of conformity. 

    At its heart, The Clowns is a play about the decisions that young people must make upon entering adulthood. Will they give up their childhood dreams in favor of something more realistic, probable and conventional, or will they hold on to the dreams of childhood even when all hope seems lost?

    Most important, who is nobler? The people who dare to dream in the face of unlikely outcomes and potential ruin or the people who modify, compromise or otherwise alter their dreams in order to earn a living, support a family and more closely align themselves with societal norms?

    Offstage, I find that most people eventually succumb to the latter, favoring conformity, conventionality and tradition over the dreams of their youth, and in many ways, sensibly, albeit tragically, so. 

    It’s a question I framed in a post from a few years ago entitled Where have all the rebels gone? I wrote:

    I tend to be someone who constantly wonders where all the rebels have gone. I cannot understand what causes the adolescent hellion, the twenty-something non-conformist and the teenage idealist to suddenly accept, embrace and surrender to the traditions and mores of modern society. I marvel at people who are my age; former activists, dreamers, militants and all-around challengers of authority, who have become so thoroughly invested in suburban conformity, expectations of appearance, the etiquette of the masses, and an overall concern with the opinions and values of the majority that they have begun to resemble the conservative, staid, judgmental, risk-free nature of their parents.

    These are questions that have plagued me for some time. I suspect that it is why I have slowly been crafting our play in this direction, in order to address these issues, albeit unknowingly.

    After years of postulating and searching, I am here to report that I’ve found all the rebels. Unfortunately, they didn’t go anywhere. 

    A paper in this week’s Science magazine seeks to demonstrate how a person’s personality is constantly changing and evolving, and though most will acknowledge changes between the past and present, we mistakenly assume that these changes have ceased to take place and our personalities and belief systems are set in stone. The research indicates otherwise. Despite our belief that we have achieved our personality apex, we will continue to change throughout our entire lives. It’s what’s known as the “end of history illusion.”

    From a TIME magazine report on this issue:

    The older you get, the less you believe you have changed or will change. This finding isn’t surprising: for years, researchers have confirmed the common-sense idea that one’s personality and preferences become more stable with age. At 80, your grandfather will likely disparage whichever political party he opposes with more ferocity than he did at 65. As the Science research explains, even young people feel their current qualities are good qualities. They find it hard to imagine their beliefs and values could significantly change — even though most of us actually change our views often as time progresses.

    It would appear that I am still surrounded by the rebels, but they simply are no longer rebels. Their beliefs and values have undergone enormous transformation over the last twenty years, and as a result, many of them have become their parents.

    This is not to say that my belief system has not changed in the last twenty years as well. It most certainly has. I can list any number of ways in which the person I am today is vastly different than the person I was two decades ago. 

    But I also believe that my refusal to abide to tradition and convention and conform to cultural expectations has not dissipated. At least I like to think it hasn’t. I may be more subtle at times about the ways in which I reject these conventions, opting for precision over brashness, but reject them I continue to do.

    I am also not the only one. One of the most nonconforming people I know (and this may come as a shock to anyone who knows her) is my wife. She is an undercover nonconformer, disguising her frequent rejections of tradition and convention with a patina of pleasantry, politeness and popularity. People adore my wife with a fervor I have rarely seen. She is a kind, generous person who puts everyone around her at ease and genuinely cares about their wellbeing. Yet she is also is less conforming than almost everyone I know. She has found a brilliant balance between the rejection of conformity and her ability to navigate the world without raising a stir.

    It’s quite remarkable.

    I suspect that I cannot be an undercover nonconformer like my wife, mostly because I am not as kind, thoughtful and measured as she. 

    But don’t let her fool you. She remains a rebel. To start, she married me, which may have been the most nonconforming act of her life.

    When I first told my close friend that I was dating Elysha, he laughed, assuming that I was joking.

    Elysha Green date Matthew Dicks? Not in a million years.

    Not only was the match unlikely because the seeming difference in our personalities, but my wife is Jewish, and I am decidedly unreligious. Almost every person in my wife’s family has dated and married within the faith, When I attend family gatherings, I am often the only non-Jewish person in the room.

    Yet not only did my wife marry me, but she almost never dated a Jewish man. Instead, she opted for Gentiles and heathens while her family (and most Jewish families in general), did otherwise.

    My wife has also embraced the Christian holidays like Christmas to a degree that would make many Jews uncomfortable. Rather than attempting to prevent our children from falling in love with the trappings of the Yuletide season (and risk losing them to the marketing appeal of Christianity), she has wrapped our children in the same joy that she now has for the Christmas season. As far as I know, she is the only member of her family to ever have a Christmas tree in her home, and our children are the only ones in the family visited by Santa Claus each year.

    Yet this is just the tip of the iceberg in terms of her nonconformity. Like me, my wife tends to lean toward logic, personal preference and individuality in many things. She simply does these things with more grace than me. While I am refusing to wear neckties and making wardrobe decisions that are oftentimes questionable at best, my wife has forged her own sense of style that causes people to take notice.

    Someone once referred to it (before we were married) as the “Elysha Green look.”

    The difference between her style and mine is simply that she looks a hell of a lot better than me. While my wardrobe decisions cause me to be viewed as a troublesome nonconformer, Elysha is viewed as chic and stylish.  

    These are just a few examples of my wife’s nonconformity. I am lucky enough to be married to her, so I see these moments of resistance every day.

    So there are still rebels in the world. Our numbers are simply dwindling under the unrelenting pressure of change. The people who once swore that they would never become their parents are becoming their parents with greater rapidity, leaving people like me on the outside, looking more and more unenlightened by the day.

    Where have all the rebels gone?

    They have gone nowhere. Like generations before us, my generation was not as special as we once thought. We did not upend society and change the world forever. We simply joined it. Slowly and methodically, with an inevitability that we never saw coming.

    A few of us remain, but if the research is correct, we may soon fall as well. I cannot see that ever happening to me, but neither did my comrades in arms. Conformity, convention and tradition has crept into every fiber of their being in a way that would appall and disgust the teenage versions of themselves.

    It’s probably happening to me. The process is simply slower. I’m a slightly tougher nut to crack. 

    It’s like Invasion of the Body Snatchers. Resistance, I fear (or at least according to science), may be futile.

    Just in case you were still questioning the existence of climate change…

    Jason Kottke sums up the debate nicely:

    The supposed debate among scientists over climate change has melted faster than the polar ice caps. National Science Board member James Lawrence Powell looked at all the related peer-reviewed scientific papers over the last several years. Twenty-four of those articles rejected the notion of climate change. Out of 14,000.

    So let this be clear: There is no scientific controversy over this. Climate change denial is purely, 100 percent made-up political and corporate-sponsored crap.

    I’m going to be quite grumpy in my old age

    Bad news for me (and Elysha), at least if Harvard’s famous longitudinal  study on happiness is correct

    “We found that contentment in the late seventies was not even suggestively associated with parental social class or even the man’s own income. What it was significantly associated with was warmth of his childhood environment, and it was very significantly associated with a man’s closeness to his father.”

    Space is suddenly a lot less impressive

    It sounds impressive, but in the end, all you need is a weather balloon, a video camera and a GPS tracker.

    And if you don’t require video footage of the historic moment, you only need the balloon and the tracker.

    For less than $200, you, too, could be the first person to put a food item in space.

    I’d send up broccoli, because that would mean there was one less broccoli here on Earth.  

    Reverse napping: Science says yes.

    In addition to gaining coverts, it turns out that there is actual science behind the Reverse Nap.

    From a Wikipedia entry on segmented sleep:

    Historian A. Roger Ekirch argues that before the Industrial Revolution, segmented sleep was the dominant form of human slumber in Western civilization. He draws evidence from documents from the ancient, medieval, and modern world, which he discovered over the course of fifteen years of research. Other historians, such as Craig Koslofsky, have endorsed Ekirch's discovery and analysis.

    According to Ekirch's argument, typically individuals slept in two distinct phases, bridged by an intervening period of wakefulness of up to an hour or more. Peasant couples, who were often too tired after field labor to do much more than eat and go to sleep, awakened later to have sex. People also used this time to pray and reflect, and to interpret dreams, which were more vivid at that hour than upon waking in the morning. This was also a favorite time for scholars and poets to write uninterrupted, whereas still others visited neighbors, or engaged in petty crime.

    Did you see that?

    “This was also a favorite time for scholars and poets to write uninterrupted…”

    I’m not a scholar and only a hack poet, but still, that’s me!

    There is also a TED Talk on the subject:

    In truth, I’m not sure how I feel about this.

    While it’s rewarding to know that science supports my idea of the Reverse Nap, I’m a little disappointed that the idea does not appear to be originally my own.

    In a perfect world, preeminent scientists  and researchers would have read my blog, been intrigued by my idea, and conducted a massive study to confirm the validity of my idea.

    Instead, it seems as if I have stumbled upon something that others stumbled upon previously.

    Decidedly less rewarding. 

    Spite is right

    I’ve often said that spite is the best reason to do anything. Here is further evidence of this fact:

    British scientist John Gurdon is told by his high school teacher that there was no hope of him ever studying science, and that doing so would be a complete waste of time for him and anyone forced to teach him.

    Gurdon was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology this year for his discovery that mature cells can be reprogrammed to become immature cells, capable of developing into all tissues of the body. Their findings have revolutionized our understanding of how cells and organisms develop.

    Though it is highly unlikely given Gurdon’s age, I hope that his high school teacher lived long enough to eat his words.